Skip to main content
Hudson logo
File #: AHBR 25-1342    Version: 1 Name:
Type: AHBR Application Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 10/14/2025 In control: Architectural & Historic Board of Review
On agenda: 10/22/2025 Final action:
Title: 49 Owen Brown Street (Historic District) Addition (second story) Submitted by WC Gotts a) Submit a floor plan b) Revise elevations to label proposed exterior materials for siding, trim, exposed foundation, and roof. c) Preservation Brief #14 states "a new addition should be smaller than the historic building - it should be subordinate in both size and design to the historic building. A new addition should be simple and unobtrusive in design, and should be distinguished from the historic building." Staff notes the proposed addition should be lower in height than the existing building and the proposed dormers be reduced or removed to meet this requirement. d) Question the proposed second story overhanging the porch. The mass would not appear to be visually supported. e) Question the resulting roof slope at the rear elevation. f) Staff notes PVC porch decking is proposed. PVC has not been an acceptable material for the historic district.
Sponsors: Planning Commission
Attachments: 1. 49 Owen Brown St - AHBR Packet, 2. Preservation Brief #14
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.

Title

49 Owen Brown Street (Historic District)

Addition (second story)

Submitted by WC Gotts

a)                     Submit a floor plan

b)                     Revise elevations to label proposed exterior materials for siding, trim, exposed foundation, and roof. 

c)                     Preservation Brief #14 states “a new addition should be smaller than the historic building - it should be subordinate in both size and design to the historic building.  A new addition should be simple and unobtrusive in design, and should be distinguished from the historic building.”  Staff notes the proposed addition should be lower in height than the existing building and the proposed dormers be reduced or removed to meet this requirement.

d)                     Question the proposed second story overhanging the porch.  The mass would not appear to be visually supported. 

e)                     Question the resulting roof slope at the rear elevation. 

f)                     Staff notes PVC porch decking is proposed.  PVC has not been an acceptable material for the historic district.