Skip to main content
Hudson logo
File #: AHBR 25-1492    Version: 1 Name:
Type: AHBR Application Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 1/20/2026 In control: Architectural & Historic Board of Review
On agenda: 1/28/2026 Final action:
Title: 6335 Elmcrest Dr Addition (Living Room, Office, Bathroom, & Bedrooms) Submitted by Justin Englert, Tim Englert Construction a) Staff notes the proposed project received BZBA approval at the January 15, 2026, BZBA meeting. b) Verify grade line is accurately depicted on submitted elevations. c) Section IV-4 (b) of the Architectural Design Standards state that the main body must be the largest visible mass and the wing must be subordinate. Staff notes that wing additions are typically subordinate in size and height to the main mass of the home. Suggest further studying to reduce the proposed height to meet this requirement. d) Staff notes the roof masses on the existing home are primarily a 4:12 pitch. Question if the two proposed front elevation reverse gables could be revised to a 4:12 pitch. e) Suggest a first floor bump out projection along the side of the addition to further break up the mass. f) Question if a one story front porch was considered. g) Section IV-4 (h)(3) of the Arc...
Attachments: 1. 6335 Elmcrest Dr - AHBR Packet
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.

Title

6335 Elmcrest Dr

Addition (Living Room, Office, Bathroom, & Bedrooms)

Submitted by Justin Englert, Tim Englert Construction

a)                     Staff notes the proposed project received BZBA approval at the January 15, 2026, BZBA meeting.

b)                     Verify grade line is accurately depicted on submitted elevations.

c)                     Section IV-4 (b) of the Architectural Design Standards state that the main body must be the largest visible mass and the wing must be subordinate. Staff notes that wing additions are typically subordinate in size and height to the main mass of the home. Suggest further studying to reduce the proposed height to meet this requirement.

d)                     Staff notes the roof masses on the existing home are primarily a 4:12 pitch.  Question if the two proposed front elevation reverse gables could be revised to a 4:12 pitch.

e)                     Suggest a first floor bump out projection along the side of the addition to further break up the mass.

f)                     Question if a one story front porch was considered. 

g)                     Section IV-4 (h)(3) of the Architectural Design Standards state that additions should be designed to be compatible with the main structure by incorporating materials and a foundation to match. Verify proposed foundation material will match the existing house.

h)                     Section IV-4 (e)(6) of the Architectural Design Standards state that windows not on the public faces of a building may be arranged more informally and may vary in size, but not style. Revise windows on rear elevation to depict a more typical window style.