Hudson logo
File #: 15-170    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Resolution Status: Passed
File created: 10/15/2015 In control: City Council
On agenda: 11/3/2015 Final action: 11/17/2015
Title: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN ADDENDUM TO A CONTRACT WITH HOUSEAL LAVIGNE ASSOCIATES, LLC FOR EXTRA CONSULTING WORK REQUIRED TO COMPLETE A DOWNTOWN PHASE II PLAN AS PART OF THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING PROCESS; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. Executive Summary: This Resolution would authorize a $6,500 increase to the original $99,880 contract.
Sponsors: William A. Currin
Indexes: Community Development
Attachments: 1. Houseal Lavigne 20140701 Scope of Work, 2. Houseal Lavigne Memo 20150622 Downtown Phase II, 3. Houseal Lavigne E-mail 20151027, 4. Resolution No. 15-170
Related files: 14-71, 15-171
Title
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN ADDENDUM TO A CONTRACT WITH HOUSEAL LAVIGNE ASSOCIATES, LLC FOR EXTRA CONSULTING WORK REQUIRED TO COMPLETE A DOWNTOWN PHASE II PLAN AS PART OF THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING PROCESS; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
Executive Summary: This Resolution would authorize a $6,500 increase to the original $99,880 contract.
Body
Legislative History
Council retained Houseal Lavigne Associates with passage of Resolution No. 14-71 on May 21, 2014.
Purpose & Explanation
Comprehensive Plan consultant Houseal Lavigne Associates has requested $6,500 over the original contract amount of $99,880. The charges are for extra work that was required to complete the Downtown Phase II Plan.

To avoid repetition of work, the consultant has been very intentional about obtaining acceptance of a work product before proceeding to the next, the prior work product usually being more general than the more detailed product to follow.

Following general acceptance of the downtown framework that laid out land use in Phase II by the Downtown Committee in March, the consultant prepared a concept plan and illustrative concept, which was a three-dimensional depiction of the plan. Staff reviewed the plan and the illustrative concept, and after making some corrections as recommended by staff to bring the plan into closer conformance with the accepted framework, a revised plan and illustrative concept were released to the Downtown Committee for review and approval.

At its meetings of May 20 and June 10, the Downtown Committee made recommendations to the plan that required significant revisions to the plan and the way it was represented. This caused the consultant to repeat several steps that were thought to have been settled including the framework plan (bubble diagram), final plan, and illustrative concept that involve labor intensive graphics.

The planning process contemplates revisions to the plan along the way; howev...

Click here for full text