Please note: this meeting's minutes have not been finalized yet. Actions taken on legislation and their results are not available.

Meeting Details

Meeting Name: Architectural & Historic Board of Review Agenda status: Final
Meeting date/time: 9/23/2026 7:30 PM Minutes status: Draft  
Meeting location: Town Hall 27 East Main Street
Published agenda: Agenda Agenda Accessible Agenda Accessible Agenda Published minutes: Not available  
Agenda packet: Not available
Meeting video:  
Attachments:
File #Ver.Agenda #NameTypeTitleActionResultAction DetailsVideo
AHBR 26-1052 2  AHBR Application5 Baldwin Street (Historic District) Alteration (Siding, Windows & Awning) Submitted by Nathan Zampelli a) Staff notes this application was continued at the September 9, 2026 AHBR meeting. b) A site visit will take place on September 22, 2026. c) Staff notes the applicant has submitted a revised west-side elevation depicting a more consistent window design for the Boards consideration. d) Appendix 1 (6) of the Secretary of Interior Standards state “deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features shall be substantiated by documentary, physical, or pictorial evidence.” e) Staff notes the applicant is seeking approval for JELD-WEN Siteline series windows for the replacement of historic materials. Staff notes that the proposed window series is not currently included on the AHBR-approved materials list for replacement windows on hi   Not available Not available
AHBR 26-643 2  AHBR Application2200 Middleton Rd Addition (Living Room & Primary Suite) Submitted by Quinn Miller, Peninsula Architects a) Staff notes this application was continued at the September 9, 2026 AHBR meeting. b) Staff notes the applicant has submitted revised elevations depicting a more consistent window type and applied foundation for the Boards consideration. c) Section IV-4 (d)(3) of the Architectural Design Standards state that the materials used in any mass must be applied consistently on that mass on all sides of the structure. Staff notes the applicant is proposing brick siding on the left and rear elevations that would not be applied around the entire mass. d) Section IV-4 (e)(4) of the Architectural Design Standards state that the building shall have a typical window used for most windows. Staff notes a mix of fixed and double hung windows are proposed. e) Section III-1(g)(8) of the Architectural Design Standards state that large expanses of blank wall are to be avoided. Fenestration placement should be at a maximum of approximately every 12 feet. Question if additional fenestration is neede   Not available Not available
AHBR 26-1252 1  AHBR Application88 N. Main Street Alteration (Door Replacement) Submitted by Joseph Kernan a) Staff has prepared the attached memo with case overview and recommendations.   Not available Not available
AHBR 26-1141 1  AHBR Application5524 Timberline Trail Addition (Sunroom) Submitted by Shelby Johnson a) Verify proposed roofing material to match existing. b) Verify proposed foundation material to match existing. c) Submit a roof plan.   Not available Not available
AHBR 26-1168 1  AHBR Application25 Clairhaven Dr Addition (2-Car Garage) Submitted by Casey Liptak a) Section III-1 (a)(4) of the Architectural Design Standards states that attached garages shall not face the street except for new development with a front yard depth of 130 feet or more. Staff notes an existing front facing garage would be rebuilt due to storm damage. Staff has determined a variance is not required under Section 1206.05(f)(1) of the Land Development Code. The garage door width would not be expanded. b) Section IV-3 (b)(1) of the Architectural Design Standards states that wings may not be larger or taller than the main body of the structure, but they may be the same height. Verify the proposed garage addition is not taller than the existing house. c) Section III-1 (g)(8) of the Architectural Design Standards states that large expanses of blank wall are to be avoided. Fenestration placement should be at a maximum of approximately every 12 feet. Revise elevations to depict additional fenestration on the south side elevation to better meet the requirement. d) Section IV-4 of the Architectural Des   Not available Not available
AHBR 26-1071 1  AHBR Application1330 Barlow Rd Alteration (Siding Application and Window Replacement) Submitted by Shannon Casey a) Staff notes the existing peaked dormer received administrative approval on September 16, 2024. b) Upon final inspection, staff observed a deviation from the final approved plans. Staff notes both horizontal siding and board and batten siding were installed within the peaked dormer in place of the approved green shake siding. The applicant has requested the AHBR consider the proposed dormer material change. Additionally staff notes the applicant is proposing to install new board and batten siding material within the existing west-side elevation dormer and bump-out to match the existing peaked dormer material. c) Staff suggests the applicant take this meeting to discuss the proposed project with the Board and verify the scope of work. d) Section IV-4 (d)(1) of the Architectural Design Standards states that the walls of the main body must be a dominant material. Up to two additional materials may be used to call attention to the composition. For example a different material may be    Not available Not available
AHBR 26-1281 1  AHBR Application39 Essex Circle Addition (Golf Simulator & Storge) Submitted by Nate Bailey, Hara Architects a) Section IV-4 (h)(1) of the Architectural Design Standards states that an additional wing may be added to any mass of the building. This wing must be attached at the rear or side of the building and may not extend forward of the main body. Additionally, Section IV-4 (b)(2) of the Architectural Design Standards states that the front face of the main body must sit forward at least 18” from the front face of the wings. Staff notes the existing house has a forward projection; however, the proposal would substantially expand it. b) Verify proposed foundation material to match existing.   Not available Not available
AHBR 26-1266 1  AHBR Application112 Parmalee Dr Addition (2-Car Garage) Submitted by Hallie Bowie a) Staff notes this application received BZBA approval at the September 16, 2026 meeting for the expansion of a non-conforming side yard setback. b) Section IV-4 (b)(1) of the Architectural Design Standards states that wings may not be larger or taller than the main body of the structure, but they may be the same height. Question if proposed addition should be inset 18” at the north-side elevation. c) Section III-1 (g)(3) of the Architectural Design Standards states that exposed foundations and tie courses shall be of a consistent material on all elevations. Revise elevations to depict a consistent foundation height/water table around the proposed garage addition.   Not available Not available
AHBR 26-1224 1  AHBR Application180 Terex Rd New House (Single-Family Dwelling) Submitted by Chris Coblentz, Coblentz Homes a) Verify grade line is accurately depicted on submitted elevations. b) Section IV-3 (g)(2) of the Architectural Design Standards states that projections which extend out from the mass to which they are attached more than five feet will be treated as wings, except for open porches, and single-story additions off the rear of multi-story dwellings. If the roof line of the addition intersects the roof line of the existing dwelling, then the addition shall be classified as a wing. Staff notes that the proposed primary suite projection extends forward approximately 9 ft from the main mass. Revise proposed projection to meet this requirement. c) Section IV-4 (g)(1) of the Architectural Design Standards states that roofs on projections should match the roof material of the building (unless both roofs are flat) and to the extent possible, shall be same kind of roof. Natural finish metals such as copper, terne coated steel, or lead may be substituted for any roofing material. Staff notes that a me   Not available Not available
AHBR 26-945 Findings of Fact 1  AHBR ApplicationArchitectural & Historic Board of Review findings of Fact for case #26-945 for the property located at 86 Owen Brown Street, Hudson, OH 44236   Not available Not available
AHBR Design Standards Update 1  MinutesAHBR discussion on draft Design Standards update.   Not available Not available
AHBR 9.9.2026 1  MinutesMinutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting: September 9, 2026   Not available Not available