|
AHBR 26-284
| 1 | | | AHBR Application | 5951 Stow Rd
Commercial Sign (Ground Sign)
Submitted by Mike Ruth, Fast Signs
a) Staff recommends approval as submitted. | | |
Not available
|
Not available
|
|
AHBR 26-228
| 1 | | | AHBR Application | 39 Church Street (Historic District)
Fence (Wood Privacy)
Submitted by Jamie Troche, Acme Fence
a) Staff recommends approval as submitted. | | |
Not available
|
Not available
|
|
AHBR 26-314
| 1 | | | AHBR Application | 40 Roslyn Ave (Historic District)
Alteration (Window Replacements)
Submitted by David Thomas
a) Staff recommends approval as submitted. | | |
Not available
|
Not available
|
|
AHBR 26-316
| 1 | | | AHBR Application | 39 Roslyn Ave (Historic District)
Alteration (Roof Replacement)
Submitted by Simon Semonin
a) Staff recommends approval as submitted. | | |
Not available
|
Not available
|
|
AHBR 26-215
| 1 | | | AHBR Application | 257 N Main Street (Historic District)
Alteration (Roof Replacement)
Submitted by Mike Farist
a) Staff recommends approval as submitted. | | |
Not available
|
Not available
|
|
AHBR 26-246
| 1 | | | AHBR Application | 53 S Hayden Pkwy
Addition (Covered Patio)
Submitted by Elijah Kaiser
a) Staff recommends approval as submitted. | | |
Not available
|
Not available
|
|
AHBR 25-1462
| 1 | | | AHBR Application | 6812 Evergreen Rd
Accessory Structure (Detached Garage)
Submitted by Dan Telehany
a) Staff recommends approval as submitted. | | |
Not available
|
Not available
|
|
AHBR 26-281
| 1 | | | AHBR Application | 5107 Darrow Rd
Addition (Covered Deck)
Submitted by Michael Molchan
a) Staff notes previous approval at December 14, 2022 AHBR meeting | | |
Not available
|
Not available
|
|
AHBR 26-409
| 1 | | | AHBR Application | 2115 E. Streetsboro St
Demolition (Detached Accessory Structure)
Submitted by Nate Bailey, Hara Architects
a) Staff notes the proposed scope of work is to demolish an existing detached garage constructed in the 1920’s
b) The existing house on the property is designated as a Historic Landmark, but the designation does not apply to the existing garage on the property.
c) Staff notes the applicant states that the existing accessory structure is in a state of significant disrepair, including structural racking, deteriorated siding, and a failing foundation.
d) As the structure is outside the historic district and is not an individual historic landmark, the AHBR may only make the following recommendation upon review: The Architectural and Historic Board of Review finds the structure at 2115 E Streetsboro St [(does)(does not)] have historic or architectural significance. Further, the Board finds that the application for a permit to demolish these structures will not voluntarily consent to the retention of these buildings. | | |
Not available
|
Not available
|
|
AHBR 26-400
| 1 | | | AHBR Application | 258 N Main Street (Historic District)
Addition (2-Car Garage, Office)
Submitted by Nate Bailey, Hara Architects
a) Staff notes that this proposal received informal AHBR review at the March 13, 2026 and April 8, 2026 meetings.
b) Question the proposed carriage house window type and how the proposed windows relate to the main mass.
c) Staff notes the design follows the guidance of Preservation Brief #14 by being subordinate to the existing building. The design is lower in height and separated by a hyphen (link). | | |
Not available
|
Not available
|
|
AHBR 26-391
| 1 | | | AHBR Application | 6591 Walnut Ct
Addition (Covered Patio)
Submitted by Trace Baum, Tab Property Enhancement LLC
a) Verify if proposed 6x6 wood posts would be wrapped in additional material.
b) Verify proposed shingles would match existing house.
c) Submit product spec sheet of proposed applied stone material. | | |
Not available
|
Not available
|
|
AHBR 26-147
| 1 | | | AHBR Application | 31 Church Street (Historic District)
Alteration (Window & Door replacement)
Submitted by Pavlo Puts
a) Staff notes the Board reviewed this application at the September 24, 2025, AHBR meeting.
b) A site visit took place on October 7, 2025.
c) Staff notes the applicant has submitted revised plans depicting the installation of double hung Marvin Ultimate series windows, as well as wood entry doors for the Boards consideration.
d) Verify simulated divided lite muntins are being proposed for the exterior entry doors. | | |
Not available
|
Not available
|
|
AHBR 26-274
| 1 | | | AHBR Application | 126 N Main Street (Historic District)
Alteration (Window Replacement)
Submitted by Heather Davies
a) The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation state that deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features shall be substantiated by documentary, physical, or pictorial evidence.
b) Staff notes that the Board may request a site visit to verify the condition of the existing windows.
c) Question the appropriateness of the proposed window material. Staff notes 6 vinyl windows are proposed. Vinyl has not been an approved material within the Historic District. Revise proposed vinyl windows to wood or aluminum-clad wood windows to be more compatible within the historic district.
d) The Secretary of Interior Standards state “the historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic | | |
Not available
|
Not available
|
|
AHBR 26-403
| 1 | | | AHBR Application | 204 Sunset Drive
Alteration (Front Porch, Siding and Stone Application, Windows, Roof)
Submitted by Brandon Gembus
a) Section III-1(g)(3) of the Architectural Design Standards states exposed foundations and tie courses shall be of a consistent material on all elevations. Question the proposed stone foundational material proposed around the garage wing and how it relates to the main mass.
b) Question how proposed stone material will be applied to the existing chimney.
c) Section IV-4 (g)(1) of the Architectural Design Standards states that roofs on projections should match the roof material of the building (unless both roofs are flat) and to the extent possible, shall be same kind of roof. Natural finish metals such as copper, terne coated steel, or lead may be substituted for any roofing material. Staff notes that a shed roof is proposed. | | |
Not available
|
Not available
|
|
AHBR 26-296
| 1 | | | AHBR Application | 150 Aurora Street (Historic District)
Addition (Office Space & Dormers)
Submitted by Eric Kuczek, Sojourn Architects
a) The National Park Service Preservation Brief #14 for additions states new additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old. Question impact of proposed 2nd story addition on the historic mass and the removal of historic materials. Additionally, question the removal of a portion of the rear roofline to accommodate the proposed addition.
b) The National Park Service Preservation Brief #14 for additions states “a new addition should be smaller than the historic building - it should be subordinate in both size and design to the historic building. A new addition should be simple and unobtrusive in design, and should be distinguished from the historic building.” Staff notes the proposed rear gable and dormer addition should be lower in height than the main mass. Revise rear elevation to better meet this requirement.
c) The Secretary of I | | |
Not available
|
Not available
|
|
AHBR 26-333
| 1 | | | AHBR Application | 39 Laurel Lake Dr
Addition (Bedroom, Great Room & Mud Room)
Submitted by Donna Anderson
a) Section IV-4(g)(4) of the Architectural Design Standards state projections on the ground floor should be carried through the foundation. Question if full foundation is needed under proposed front elevation bay window.
b) Section IV-4(e)(4) of the Architectural Design Standards state that the building shall have a typical window used for most windows. Question the proposed casement windows proposed on the left side elevation. | | |
Not available
|
Not available
|
|
AHBR 26-374
| 1 | | | AHBR Application | 11 S. Main Street
Alteration (ADA Lift)
Submitted by Jarlath Caldwell
a) Staff notes this proposal was previously presented to the Board as a discussion item at the February 25, 2026, AHBR meeting, at which time staff informed the Board that a formal application would be submitted at a later date.
b) Staff notes the city has since coordinated with GPD Group regarding the attached drawings and with Lift Up, the manufacture of the proposed lift system.
c) Staff notes the following:
a. The proposed lift style was chosen to be less impactful and replicate stairs when not operational.
b. The lift would be painted white. The proposed color was field color-matched to the existing structure to match. The manufacturer further recommended that the treads remain unpainted with a wood finish, while the railings were also color matched to the existing gazebo.
c. Note interior railing details
d. The proposed lift location off the existing southeast corner of the gazebo was chosen to be less obtrusive when compared to other elevations.
e. Desire of the city to incorporate ADA acces | | |
Not available
|
Not available
|
|
AHBR 26-320
| 1 | | | AHBR Application | 159 Hudson Street
New House (Single-Family Dwelling, Detached Garage, Accessory Structure, & Retaining Wall)
Submitted by Brendan Boatwright
a) Section IV-4 (g)(2) of the Architectural Design Standards state that projections which extend out from the mass to which they are attached more than five feet will be treated as wings, except for open porches, and single story additions off the rear of multi-story dwellings. If the roof line of the addition intersects the roof line of the existing dwelling, then the addition shall be classified as a wing. This guideline should not be construed to mean a masonry pier or continuous wall foundation is required upon the enclosure of an existing deck or porch. Staff notes that the proposed front elevation projection would extend in front of the main body by approximately 7 ft. Revise elevations to meet this requirement.
b) Section III-1(g)(3) of the Architectural Design Standards states exposed foundations and tie courses shall be of a consistent material on all elevations. Revise elevations to depict a more consistently applied exposed founda | | |
Not available
|
Not available
|
|
AHBR 25-1478 Findings of Fact
| 1 | | | Minutes | Architectural and Historic Board of Review Findings of Fact for case #25-1478 for the property located at 88 N Main Street, Hudson, OH 44236 | | |
Not available
|
Not available
|
|
AHBR 3.11.2026
| 1 | | | Minutes | Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting: March 11, 2026 | | |
Not available
|
Not available
|
|
AHBR 4.8.2026
| 1 | | | Minutes | Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting: April 8, 2026. | | |
Not available
|
Not available
|
|
AHBR 4.22.2026
| 1 | | | Minutes | Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting: April 22, 2026. | | |
Not available
|
Not available
|