AHBR 25-1173
| 1 | A. | | AHBR Application | 190 W Streetsboro St
Sign (Ground Sign)
Submitted by Splott Graphics
a) Staff recommends approval as submitted. | | |
Not available
|
Video
|
AHBR 25-1021
| 2 | A. | | AHBR Application | 176 Elm St (Historic District)
Alterations (Siding, Window Trim & Shutters) | | |
Not available
|
Video
|
AHBR 25-1194
| 1 | A. | | AHBR Application | 72 N Main Street (Historic District)
Commercial Sign (Hanging Sign)
Submitted by Marie Cipolletta, Signarama
a) Section V-5(c)(3) states “Signs should have a matte finish, not have a glossy or reflective finish.” Verify a matte finish.
b) Question how proposed materials and design are compatible with the surrounding signs. Staff recommends the sign be constructed of High Density Urethane (HDU) or wood, similar to the other surrounding hanging signs. | | |
Not available
|
Video
|
AHBR 25-1195
| 1 | B. | | AHBR Application | 98 N Main St (Historic District)
Sign (Wall & Hanging Sign)
Submitted by Melanie Brunty
a) Revise submitted elevations to verify proposed materials, dimensions, and finish would match the existing signage. | | |
Not available
|
Video
|
AHBR 25-930
| 1 | C. | | AHBR Application | 38 Church St (Historic District)
Fence (6-foot privacy) | | |
Not available
|
Video
|
AHBR 25-1193
| 1 | D. | | AHBR Application | 130 Elm St
Alteration (Roof Replacement)
Submitted by Bill Buehl, A&B Roofing
a) Verify the existing roof material and if there are any differences in proposed material.
b) Question how materials would blend with the existing roof shingles. | | |
Not available
|
Video
|
AHBR 25-1196
| 1 | E. | | AHBR Application | 31 Church Street (Historic District)
Alteration (Window Replacements)
Submitted by Pavlo Puts
a) The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation state that deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features shall be substantiated by documentary, physical, or pictorial evidence. Provide documentation verifying the need for replacement.
b) Staff notes Pella Lifestyle windows are proposed, as well as composite doors. Revise the proposed door to wood and question the Pella Lifestyle as a replacement for historic wood windows. Staff notes the Pella Architectural Series is typically preferred as a replacement. | | |
Not available
|
Video
|
AHBR 25-1093
| 1 | F. | | AHBR Application | 358 Oldham Way
Addition (3 Seasons Room)
Submitted by Dylan Hart, Portage Timberworks
a) Staff notes that this application was tabled at the September 24, 2025, AHBR meeting.
b) The applicant has submitted revised elevations for the Board’s consideration. | | |
Not available
|
Video
|
AHBR 25-611
| 1 | G. | | AHBR Application | 85 Division Street (Historic District)
Addition (Bedroom)
Submitted by Johnathan Flemming
a) Question age of the existing rear wing addition.
b) Question if the gables and window trim are accurately depicted in the submitted elevations.
c) The National Park Service Preservation Brief for additions states new additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old. Question impact of proposed addition on the historic mass and the removal of historic materials. Suggest insetting the addition or creating a clearer transition point to create a visible break between masses.
d) The National Park Service Preservation Brief for additions states new additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. Question the removal of a portion of the rear roofline and facade to accommodate the proposed addition.
e) Qu | | |
Not available
|
Video
|
AHBR 9.10.2025
| 1 | | | Minutes | Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting: September 10, 2025. | | |
Not available
|
Video
|