AHBR 24-50
| 2 | D. | | AHBR Application | 5 Atterbury (Everbowl)
Sign (Wall Sign) | approved | |
Action details
|
Video
|
AHBR 23-1135
| 2 | C. | | AHBR Application | 95 Bard Drive (Hudson Yard Townhouses)
Signs (Ground Signs) | approved | |
Action details
|
Video
|
AHBR 23-1132
| 3 | A. | | AHBR Application | 50 Division Street (Historic District)
Alterations (Door) | continued | |
Action details
|
Video
|
AHBR 24-58
| 2 | A. | | AHBR Application | 51 S. Main Street (Nona’s)
Sign (Wall Sign) | approved as amended | Pass |
Action details
|
Video
|
AHBR 24-57
| 2 | B. | | AHBR Application | 85 S. Main Street (Berkshire Hathway)
Sign (Wall Sign) | approved as amended | Pass |
Action details
|
Video
|
AHBR 24-97
| 2 | E. | | AHBR Application | 358 Atterbury Blvd
Addition (704sqft Great Room) | approved | Pass |
Action details
|
Video
|
AHBR 24-76
| 2 | F. | | AHBR Application | 259 S. Main Street
Addition (392sqft Master Suite)
Submitted by Terry Crites
a) The Architectural Design Standards state large expanses of blank wall are to be avoided. Fenestration placement should be at a maximum of approximately every 12 feet. Revise the rear elevation to depict fenestration. Suggest revising the right elevation to show enlarged window openings to better meet this requirement.
b) The Architectural Design Standards state doors and windows on the public faces of a building should be arranged so that they are regulated by a system of (invisible) parallel and perpendicular lines. Question if the right elevation windows could be revised to be more symmetrical.
c) The Architectural Design Standards state exposed foundations and tie courses shall be of a consistent material on all elevations. Confirm proposed exposed foundation will match the existing. | continued | |
Action details
|
Video
|
AHBR 24-65
| 2 | G. | | AHBR Application | 136 Hudson Street (Historic District)
Addition (Bedroom, Laundry, Family Room & Screened Porch)
Submitted by Fred Margulies, Architect
a) At the February 28, 2024 AHBR meeting, the Board requested the assistance of Perspectus to review the proposed plans.
b) Perspectus provided a report (in the attachments). The applicant did submit changed to the proposed design based on the report comments.
c) Staff notes the consultant recommended the addition inset from the east elevation to allow the existing house to be distinguished from the addition. The current design does not include this change. Additionally, the existing material is wood and the applicant is proposing hardi on the addition, causing a material change on the same wall plane. Suggest the addition be inset to address this comment.
d) The consultant recommends a simplified window design. Staff recommends a more simplified double hung window for all elevations.
e) The consultant recommends the clerestory type windows be redesigned to show two or three one over one double hung windows evenly spaced out. Staff notes the current d | continued | |
Action details
|
Video
|
AHBR 24-94
| 2 | I. | | AHBR Application | 146 Hudson Street (Historic District)
Addition (161sqft Sunroom) | approved | Pass |
Action details
|
Video
|
AHBR 7077
| 1 | A. | | Minutes | Council Annual Check-in - CONTINUED | approved | Pass |
Action details
|
Video
|
AHBR 1-24-2024
| 1 | B. | | Minutes | Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting: January 24, 2024. | approved as amended | Pass |
Action details
|
Video
|