Ethics Commission that she was able to represent herself as a private citizen. She spoke regarding the standard
of review in administrative appeals, density calculations, wetlands, storm water, and meetings with City staff.
Mr. Skylar Sutton, 2243 Ravenna St., having consulted with the Ohio Ethics Commission, spoke as a private
citizen and resident whose property shares a western border with the proposed subdivision, stating the site plan
violates several City codes regarding storm water, wetlands, and density. He requested that Council deny the
appeal.
Ms. Kim Cosma Segedy, an owner and previous resident at 2242 Ravenna St., stated that the area is very wet
and runoff is intense. She is fine with development but said that it should fit the area, and this plan does not fit.
Mayor Anzevino then asked if there was anyone from the general public that wanted to speak .
Mr. Jared Florian stated that he has been working with Prestige for many years to build a home in Hudson and
it is next to impossible to find property.
Mr. Bill Foley, 6490 Paderborne Cir., commented that he has been unsuccessful in looking for land for over a
year to build a ranch home and believes that there is significant demand for this type of housing that is currently
unmet.
Mr. John Russell, owner of Prestige Builder Group, stated that there is a change in the need of the people
building homes, with first floor masters and smaller layouts. He further commented that maybe the proposed
development would benefit the area by improving the current water issues.
Mr. Matthew Jones, 2233 Ravenna St., stated that, as an adjacent property owner to the proposed development,
he has never been contacted by Mr. Russell or heard from him about the plan.
Mr. Vicanti was then given the floor to address the testimonies, responding to comments about the standard of
review, deference to administrative agencies, and compliance with the requirements for a preliminary review .
He further stated that Mr. Sutton's storm water concerns should be addressed by professionals and objected to
Mr. Sutton's electronic files to City Council.
Mr. Sutton approached the podium again to clarify that he retained a civil engineer with private funds to review
the storm water information. He also objected to the applicant's submittal.
Mayor Anzevino then allowed staff to make comments.
Mr. Hannan made comments based on testimony from the applicant regarding missing wetland information and
approvals for the proposed layout, noted issues regarding storm water direction, visibility from Ravenna St, that
there are other ways to meet open space conservation on this site, and that multi-family housing is not permitted
in District 2. He further stated that the applicant has the opportunity to resubmit or propose a new design .
Mayor Anzevino asked for Council comments.
Responding to a question by Mr. Foster, Mr. Vacanti said that the City's code encourages a clustering
mechanism for this property, preserving natural areas and development on farmed area .
Due to recent historic rain events, Dr. Goetz stated that she is skeptical that engineers can make the storm water
better for this plan since much of Hudson is wetlands. Mr. Vacanti responded that the storm water analysis is
part of the final plan due to the cost and time involved.
Mrs. Heater stated that the Planning Commission gave opportunities to the applicant to have some
consideration for adjustments but the plan does not meet open space conservation requirements, not the right
approach for the area, and was denied by all Planning Commission members. Responding to a question by Mrs.
Heater, Mr. Brown stated this is the best way to develop property in Hudson and every remaining property in
the City will have wetland and storm water issues.
Dr. Bird echoed Mrs. Heater's comments, stating that he only learned about the project through public
comments and meetings.