City of Hudson, Ohio  
Meeting Minutes - Final  
Architectural & Historic Board of Review  
John Caputo, Chair  
Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair  
John Workley, Secretary  
Amy Manko  
Françoise Massardier-Kenney  
Jamie Sredinski  
Nicholas Sugar, City Planner  
Lauren Coffman, Associate Planner  
Wednesday, June 25, 2025  
7:30 PM  
Town Hall  
27 East Main Street  
I.  
Call To Order  
Chair Caputo called to order the regularly scheduled meeting of the Architectural & Historic  
Board of Review of the City of Hudson at 7:30 p.m., in accordance with the Sunshine Laws of  
the State of Ohio, O.R.C. Section 121.22.  
II.  
Roll Call  
Present: 6 -  
Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms.  
Manko  
III.  
Public Comment  
Chair Caputo opened the meeting to public comments for anyone wanting to address the  
Board. There were no comments.  
IV.  
Consent Applications  
A motion was made by Mr. Workley, seconded by Ms. Marzulla, that the Consent  
Agenda be approved. The motion carried by the following vote:  
Aye:  
6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms.  
Manko  
A.  
B.  
144 Hudson Street (Historic District)  
Accessory Structure  
Attachments:  
This AHBR agenda item was approved on the Consent Agenda.  
219 N. Main Street  
Sign  
Attachments:  
This AHBR agenda item was approved on the Consent Agenda.  
V.  
A.  
Old Business  
7 College St. (Historic District)  
Accessory Structure - Fence (6 foot privacy)  
Attachments:  
Ms. Coffman introduced the application by describing the project and reviewing the staff  
comments.  
Mr. Bruce Huffer, Northeast Ohio Fence was present for the meeting.  
The Board, staff, and applicant, discussed: The location of the proposed wood fence - which  
the applicant described as behind the house with one gate, and the type of proposed fence .  
A motion was made by Ms. Kenney, seconded by Mr. Workley, that this AHBR  
Application be approved. The motion carried by the following vote:  
Aye:  
6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms.  
Manko  
B.  
80 N Oviatt St (Historic District)  
Accessory Structure - Fence (6 ft privacy)  
Attachments:  
Ms. Coffman introduced the application by displaying the site plan and reviewing the staff  
comments.  
Mr. Bruce Huffer, Northeast Ohio Fence was present for the meeting.  
The Board, applicant, and staff discussed: The design and location of the fence, that no  
connection with the neighbor's matching fence will take place,  
Mr. Donald Harvey, homeowner, noted the proposed fence will match the neighbor's fence.  
the measurements on the drawings,  
A motion was made by Ms. Kenney, seconded by Mr. Workley, that this AHBR  
Application be approved. The motion carried by the following vote:  
Aye:  
6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms.  
Manko  
72 Aurora Street (Historic District)  
Addition (Guest Bathroom & Terrace)  
Attachments:  
Ms. Coffman introduced the application by reviewing the elevations, describing the project,  
and reviewing the revised elevations.  
Mr. Eric Kuczek, applicant, described the updated railings, showed samples of the proposed  
brick, and Anderson door and windows.  
The Board, applicant, and staff discussed: The proposed wood Anderson door, the mullions  
which should be applied to the glass, and that an existing door may be reused,  
Ms. Amy Ford, homeowner, stated an attempt was made to use an existing door, but because  
it is not weatherized it may not be used, and that all attempts will be made to stay close to the  
historic look and material.  
A motion was made by Ms. Kenney, seconded by Mr. Workley, that this AHBR  
Application be approved as amended with applied mullions on the glass of the door. The  
motion carried by the following vote:  
Aye:  
6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms.  
Manko  
VI.  
H.  
New Business  
2500 Hudson Aurora Rd  
Addition (Orchestra Room)  
Attachments:  
Mr. Sugar introduced the application by describing and displaying the addition, noting PC  
approved the site plan, and reviewing the staff comments.  
Mr. John Peterson, GPD Group, and Mr. Tom Barone, Hudson Public Schools, described the  
project and location of the project on the campus, as fitting with the architecture of the high  
school, the window types, banding around the addition, and brick materials. Mr. Peterson also  
described elements of the design, and commented on: The new doors on the southwest side,  
that the mechanicals will be internal, and that the four trees which will be removed will be  
replaced with new trees.  
A motion was made by Ms. Kenney, seconded by Ms. Sredinski, that this AHBR  
Application be approved. The motion carried by the following vote:  
Aye:  
6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms.  
Manko  
A.  
72 N Main Street (Historic District)  
Sign  
Attachments:  
Ms. Coffman introduced the application by noting the location of the proposed sign and  
reviewing the staff comments.  
Mr. Daxx Vedrin, business owner, stated none of the nearby signs have seven feet clearance,  
and the sign will be the same material and thickness as the adjoining sign.  
The Board, applicant, and staff, noted the area is unique with the overhang and there is little  
danger of people walking under the signs, and the proposed design will meet the overall  
standards intent.  
Staff noted the Board might require a high density urethane in place of the proposed PVC.  
A motion was made by Mr. Workley, seconded by Ms. Marzulla, that this AHBR  
Application be approved as amended with the use of high density urethane or wood. The  
motion carried by the following vote:  
Aye:  
6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms.  
Manko  
139 Hudson Street  
B.  
Accessory Structure  
Attachments:  
Ms. Coffman introduced the application by noting it was previously approved and now the  
applicant is proposing a change in the siding material.  
Mr. Tim Hopkins, homeowner, noted the change is at his request for personal preference.  
The Board, applicant, and staff, noted the proposed siding color will be very similar to the  
approved color and that other houses on the street have the same type of siding. The Board  
also noted a preference for some shake elements to tie it to the house, staff pointed out the  
proposed gable returns match the house, and the possibility of the six-over-six windows  
matching.  
A motion was made by Mr. Workley, seconded by Ms. Kenney, that this AHBR  
Application be approved as amended with six-over-six windows and the requested siding  
change, subject to staff approval. The motion carried by the following vote:  
Aye:  
6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms.  
Manko  
C.  
2507 Barlow Road  
Accessory Structure (Agricultural Barn)  
Attachments:  
Ms. Coffman introduced the application by displaying the site plan, describing the project,  
noting the applicable LDCs, and reviewing the staff report.  
Mr. Kevin Dravis, applicant, noted the fence will be four feet tall for the sake of animal  
containment, which is a permitted for agricultural use, and in place of windows the Board  
suggested others types of fenestration to break up the wide wall expanse.  
A motion was made by Mr. Workley, seconded by Ms. Kenney, that this AHBR  
Application be approved as amended with the addition of 3, 3 foot by 3 foot,  
fenestrations on the west side.. The motion carried by the following vote:  
Aye:  
6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms.  
Manko  
D.  
200 Laurel Lake Drive (Villa 23)  
Addition  
Attachments:  
Ms. Coffman introduced the application by displaying the site plan, and reviewing the staff  
comments.  
Ms. Donna Anderson, and Mr. Brian Harvey, Lewis Construction, were present for the  
meeting. Ms. Anderson noted she is speaking for Laurel Lake and the homeowner, and noted  
the one foot jog in the wall will not lead to good aesthetics in the bedroom.  
The Board, applicant, and staff, noted the staff comment regarding the inset will affect the  
size of the room and the ability to place furniture on the wall, that the proposed wall has no  
precedence in Laurel Lake, and the possibility of a frieze board to assist with the facade  
change.  
The applicant requested a continuance.  
A motion was made by Ms. Marzulla, seconded by Mr. Workley, that this AHBR  
Application be continued. The motion carried by the following vote:  
Aye:  
6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms.  
Manko  
E.  
7593 E Partridge Meadows Dr.  
Addition (Bedroom & Office)  
Attachments:  
Ms. Coffman introduced the application by displaying a rendering of the proposed house, the  
addition, the elevations, and reviewing the staff comments.  
Mr. Nate Bailey, Hara Architects, stated the goal of the project is to provide a first floor suite  
for aging in place and other functionality, that an existing well is partially dictating the  
proposed layout of the addition, that at staff's suggestion the addition was moved, that the  
frieze boards are a value add to the design, and that the typical window size may be changed  
as AHBR wishes.  
The Board, applicant, and staff discussed the window size and that shutters will not be added,  
the possibility of repeating the vertical siding somewhere else on the house, that the vertical  
siding color has not been decided, that the Board appreciates the proposed plan being built  
around the well, that some of the existing shutters would not be allowed because they could  
not close over the entire window, that several elements make the addition compatible with the  
main house, the possibility of placing the windows with greater symmetry, and that the  
fenestration meets the LDC.  
A motion was made by Ms. Kenney, seconded by Mr. Workley, that this AHBR  
Application be approved. The motion carried by the following vote:  
Aye:  
6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms.  
Manko  
F.  
20 Pinewood Ln  
Addition (Kitchen, Family Room & Bedroom)  
Attachments:  
Ms. Coffman introduced the application by describing the project and reviewing the staff  
comments.  
Mr. Nate Bailey, Hara Architects, described the project which is intended to update the house  
with a larger kitchen and family room, replace the windows around the house, add a rear  
addition with casement windows, use a consistent brick on the addition, that the dormer will  
be reworked to match the addition, that the revised drawings show a hip roof as opposed to  
the current flat roof, and that the addition steps back - so as not to violate the setback.  
The Board, applicant, and staff discussed, that the dormer in the front is not part of this  
project, that the window grids around the house will match, the windows the neighbors can  
see, that the rear landscaping will have engineering approval, and that no grids in the front  
helps the look of the casement windows in the rear.  
A motion was made by Mr. Workley, seconded by Ms. Kenney, that this AHBR  
Application be approved as amended with the proposed changes to the foundation, and  
consistent window grids around the house, as approved by staff. The motion carried by  
the following vote:  
Aye:  
6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms.  
Manko  
G.  
13 N. Oviatt St  
New Construction (Single-family dwelling)  
Attachments:  
Mr. Sugar introduced the application by describing the project and reviewing the staff  
comments.  
Mr. Nate Bailey, Hara Architects, Ms. Megan Brahm, and Mr. Clay Brahm, homeowners,  
were present for the meeting. Mr. Bailey noted the existing house was approved for  
demolition and displayed a rendering of the proposed house. He explained the inset  
entryway's function and that it fits well with the historic village, that shutters will be used  
around the house - aside for the small kitchen window, that PVC is proposed for the shutters,  
and the goal of his clients is for a family home that fits into it's historic context.  
The Board, applicant, and staff, discussed, the inset entryway that additional columns which  
outline the doors and create three bays might be more fitting, that PVC shutters have not been  
approved in the historic district, the applicant's willingness to change to a wood or wood-like  
shutter material, the acceptable windows which will be submitted to staff for approval, and  
that a four or six inch reveal siding will be used.  
Ms. Kenney made a motion, seconded by Ms. Srednski, that: additional columns be  
added to the inset to create three bays, that the reveal of the siding be four or six inch,  
that wood or wood-like shutters be used, and the window brand and type, all of the  
conditions are subject to staff approval. The motion was approved by the following vote:  
Aye:  
6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms.  
Manko  
VII. Other Business  
Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting: June  
11, 2025.  
Attachments:  
A motion was made by Ms. Marzulla, seconded by Mr. Workley, that the June 11, 2025,  
Minutes be approved. The motion carried by the following vote:  
Aye:  
5 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms. Manko  
1 - Ms. Kenney  
Abstain:  
Discussion of AHBR Consultant  
Mr. Sugar noted discussions with Naylor-Wellman are in process regarding the firm resuming  
as the historic consultants.  
A motion was made by Ms. Marzulla, seconded by Ms. Sredinski, that a contract be  
signed with Naylor - Wellman to work with AHBR as the consultant. The motion  
carried by the following vote:  
Aye:  
6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms.  
Manko  
VIII. Staff Update  
There was no Other Business.  
IX.  
Adjournment  
A motion was made by Ms. Marzulla, seconded by Mr. Workley, that the meeting be  
adjourned at 9:34 p.m.. The motion carried by the following vote:  
Aye:  
6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms.  
Manko  
___________________________________________  
John Caputo, Chair  
___________________________________________  
John Workley, Secretary  
___________________________________________  
Joe Campbell, Executive Assistant  
Upon approval by the Architectural & Historic Board of Review, this official written  
summary of the meeting minutes shall become a permanent record, and the official minutes  
shall also consist of a permanent audio and video recording, excluding executive sessions, in  
accordance with Codified Ordinances, Section 252.04, Minutes of Architectural and Historic  
Board of Review, Board of Zoning and Building Appeals, and Planning Commission.  
*
*
*