City of Hudson, Ohio  
CD Meeting Agenda - Final  
Architectural & Historic Board of Review  
John Caputo, Chair  
Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair  
John Workley, Secretary  
Andrew Brown  
Amy Manko  
Françoise Massardier-Kenney  
Jamie Sredinski  
Nicholas Sugar, City Planner  
Lauren Coffman, Associate Planner  
Wednesday, April 22, 2026  
7:30 PM  
Town Hall  
27 East Main Street  
Call To Order  
Roll Call  
I.  
II.  
III.  
IV.  
Public Comment  
Consent Applications  
67 Division Street (Historic District)  
Alteration (Roof Replacement)  
Submitted by Bill Buehl, A&B Roofing  
a) Staff recommends approval as submitted.  
Attachments:  
30 Ravenna Street  
Sign (Ground and Wall Sign)  
Submitted by Mark Loboda  
a) Staff recommends approval as submitted.  
Attachments:  
Old Business  
V.  
88 N Main Street (Historic District)  
Alterations (Door Replacement)  
Submitted by Joseph Kernan  
a) Staff notes this application was continued from the April 8, 2026, AHBR  
meeting.  
b) The AHBR requested the applicant add additional detail to the proposed  
front entry door to better align with the surrounding Historic District.  
c) Staff notes the applicant has submitted a letter in response to the previous  
AHBR comments.  
Attachments:  
Legislative History  
2/25/26  
3/11/26  
Architectural & Historic Board continued  
of Review  
Architectural & Historic Board continued  
of Review  
New Business  
VI.  
6492 Elmcrest Dr  
Alteration (Applied Stone & Siding)  
Submitted by Bob Zickefoose  
a) Section IV(1(d)(2) of the Architectural Design Standards state that the  
materials used in the main body must be applied consistently on that mass  
on all sides of the structure. Section III-1 (g)(3) of the Architectural Design  
Standards states that exposed foundations and tie courses shall be of a  
consistent material on all elevations. Staff notes the applicant is proposing  
applied stone detail that would not be applied around the entire mass.  
Additionally, staff notes the proposed stone on the front elevation  
terminates on an outside corner. However, staff notes that the existing  
brick material on the front elevation is currently non-conforming and  
terminates on an outside corner.  
b) Suggest the exposed foundation be continued along the rear elevation and  
terminate a the 3 seasons room to meet this requirement.  
c) Verify stone placement on side elevation.  
d) Verify horizontal siding is proposed on garage front elevation.  
e) Verify proposed stone material on columns would match proposed stone  
foundational material.  
Attachments:  
85 Division Street (Historic District)  
Accessory Structure (Pergola)  
Submitted by Dan Hickin  
a) Question the appropriateness of the proposed aluminum material. Staff  
notes an aluminum pergola is proposed. Suggest revising proposed material to  
wood or previously approved wood substitute material for greater  
compatibility within the surrounding Historic District.  
Attachments:  
1597 Hines Hill Rd  
Accessory Structure (Carriage House)  
Submitted by Leon Sampat, LS Architects  
a) Section III-1 (d)(5) of the Architectural Design Standards state that all  
facades (including the rear) over twelve (12) feet long shall have at least  
one window or door opening. Fenestration placement on the accessory  
structure shall be proportional to the house. Suggest additional  
fenestration on north- side elevation to meet this requirement.  
b) Section III-1 (d)(2) of the Architectural Design Standards state that  
enclosed accessory buildings shall incorporate some elements similar to  
the main body, for example similar corner boards, window types, or  
materials. Question the proposed window type and how it relates to the  
main house. Staff notes that double hung windows are proposed, where the  
house has casement windows.  
c) Verify proposed stone foundational material to match existing house.  
d) Submit product spec sheets of all proposed exterior materials.  
Attachments:  
670 Terex Rd  
Addition (Living Room, Kitchen, & Garage)  
Submitted by Andrew Heilmeier  
a) Staff notes this application received informal AHBR review at the October  
8, 2025, meeting.  
b) The applicant has submitted revised elevations for the Boards  
consideration.  
c) Section IV-4 (g)(1) of the Architectural Design Standards states that roofs  
on projections should match the roof material of the building (unless both  
roofs are flat) and to the extent possible, shall be same kind of roof.  
Natural finish metals such as copper, terne coated steel, or lead may be  
substituted for any roofing material. Verify all roofing material would be a  
consistent material.  
d) Section IV-4(a) of the Architectural Design Standards states the two story  
wing type has a main body and subordinate wings. Wings are smaller in  
size. Staff notes the proposed addition would be in line with the main mass.  
Suggest insetting the proposed addition at the left side elevation to create a  
more prominent break in massing. Additionally, Section IV-4(d)(3) of the  
Architectural Design Standards state the materials used in any mass must  
be applied consistently on that mass on all sides of the structure. Staff  
notes that insetting the proposed addition 18” would allow the proposed  
horizontal siding material to terminate on an inside corner.  
e) Section IV-4(d)(1) of the Architectural Design Standards state the walls of  
the main body must be a dominant material. Up to two additional  
materials may be used to call attention to the composition. For example a  
different material may be used on building projections gable ends,  
entrance recesses, or to emphasize the horizontal or vertical divisions of  
the building. Staff notes three materials are proposed within the main  
body; horizontal siding, vertical siding, and brick.  
f) Question proposed clipped roof on left and rear elevations.  
g) Question proposed column height on left side elevation.  
h) Question if proposed man door on left side elevation would be centered  
under the proposed gable.  
i) Question proposed foundational material and how it relates to the main  
mass.  
Attachments:  
Legislative History  
10/8/25 Architectural & Historic Board continued  
of Review  
200 Laurel Lake Dr  
New House (Villas)  
Submitted by John Ducatman, RDL Architects  
a) Staff notes this application received informal AHBR review at the  
February 28, 2024 meeting. The project received site plan approval from  
Planning Commission and Board of Zoning and Building Appeals.  
b) The application received formal review from the AHBR on April 8, 2026.  
c) Staff comments are attached for the Boards review.  
Attachments:  
Staff notes the applicant is working to revise the submitted elevations to address all Board  
comments. Request to table to the May 13, 2026 AHBR Meeting  
Other Business  
VII.  
Architectural and Historic Board of Review Findings of Fact for case #22-730  
for the property located at 5530 Stonecreek Way, Hudson, OH 44236  
Attachments:  
Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting: March  
11, 2026  
Attachments:  
Staff Update  
VIII.  
IX.  
Adjournment  
*
*
*