Ms. Roseanne Thomas, 2573 Brunswick Ln., asked for an explanation for the Discussion Item header on the
agenda as there was no subject listed.
Mr. Ron Brubaker, 7593 Partridge Meadows Dr. East, representing Trail Advocates of Summit County, thanked
Mr. Kosco, Mr. Hannan, and Mr. Sugar for meeting with the Rails to Trails Conservancy Group to discuss the
purchase of a one mile section from Norfolk Southern.
7.
Correspondence and Council Comments
Dr. Goetz provided a Cemetery Board update and said the group with try to do the tour of the Old Township
Burial Ground in the spring.
Mr. Banweg thanked the community for supporting the Landsberg student exchange program, thanked staff for
the Fire/EMS Open House, and stated that the Military and Veterans' Commission is finalizing the Veterans'
Day ceremony for November 11th at 11:00 a.m. at the Boy Scout Cabin.
Mrs. Kowalski reminded residents about the HCTV open house on October 17th at Hudson High School, Door
M.
Mr. Sutton thanked safety forces for the open house and Ace Hardware for the fire extinguisher exchange . He
also stated that the Fiber to the Home subcommittee reviewed the survey results and staff will create financial
models to see what an expansion would look like.
Dr. Bird also thanked staff for the safety services open house and recognized Kevin Nelson who got kids excited
about fire safety.
Mr. Foster provided a Planning Commission update, stating that Ordinance Nos. 24-104 and 24-105 would be
coming back to Council, with a request from several Planning Commission members to not be sent anymore
Land Development Code changes until a full review of the Land Development Code could be performed .
Mr. Foster then summarized the timeline of events that led Council to censure Mrs. Kowalski on December 6,
2022. He stated that following the 2022 censure, Mrs. Kowalski forwarded privileged documents to Mr. Don
Reed, which he said was improper and illegal. He further provided explanation for why this action was
improper and illegal, citing a verified email from Don Reed and a court order holding that a portion of the
records that had been forwarded to Mr. Reed were covered by the attorney-client privilege. He then made a
motion to censure Mrs. Kowalski, invoking the Council's legislative authority to express its opinion that Mrs.
Kowalski had acted improperly and should be verbally rebuked. Mr. Banweg seconded the motion and
requested a recess.
Dr. Goetz called for a point of order, asking whether Council Comments was an appropriate place for this type
of motion. Mr. Pitchford responded affirmatively and stated it could be done in other places on the agenda as
well.
Mayor Anzevino recessed the regular meeting at 8:20 p.m. to allow Councilmembers to review the documents
provided by Mr. Foster. Mayor Anzevino resumed the regular meeting at 8:36 p.m.
Dr. Goetz called for a point of order, stating that the censure was in violation of the Ohio Open Meetings Act
because it did not appear on the agenda. Mr. Pitchford responded that the meeting was a regularly scheduled
Council meeting and bringing forth the motion to censure was not a violation of the Open Meetings Act.
Mr. Foster stated that the court found the documents to be privileged and while there are several routes Council
could take, it was Council's duty to convey that this type of behavior will not be tolerated.
Mrs. Kowalski responded that it took the court two years to rule on the lawsuit because it was not clear whether
there was a partial or full waiver of privilege. She further stated that she has not been afforded due process for
any of the attempts to censure, how she upheld her oath of office, and filed a lawsuit in an effort to clear her
professional reputation.