City of Hudson, Ohio  
CD Meeting Agenda - Final  
Architectural & Historic Board of Review  
John Caputo, Chair  
Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair  
John Workley, Secretary  
Françoise Massardier-Kenney  
William Ray  
Jamie Sredinski  
Karl Wetzel  
Nicholas Sugar, City Planner  
Amanda Krickovich, Associate Planner  
Wednesday, September 11, 2024  
7:30 PM  
Town Hall  
27 East Main Street  
Call To Order  
Roll Call  
I.  
II.  
III.  
Public Comment  
Consent Applications  
IV.  
A.  
AHBR  
7299 Dillman Dr  
24-1016  
Pergola  
Submitted by Landmark Property Services Deserio  
a) Staff recommends approval as submitted.  
Attachments:  
7299 Dillman Dr AHBR Packet  
Old Business  
V.  
A.  
AHBR 24-849  
264 E Streetsboro St  
Addition (Front Porch)  
Submitted by Shawn Hook  
a) Staff notes the request was heard at the August 12, 2024 AHBR meeting.  
The AHBR requested a hip roof redesign be submitted.  
b) The applicant has further studied the shed roof design and requested to  
present revised drawings and examples to the AHBR.  
Attachments:  
Revised Drawings for 9.9.24 Meeting  
264 E. Streetsboro St AHBR Packet  
Legislative History  
8/14/24 Architectural & Historic Board continued  
of Review  
New Business  
VI.  
A.  
AHBR 24-  
135  
1727 Mayflower Ln  
Addition (Attached Garage)  
Submitted by Timothy Raggets  
a) Staff notes this case went to the April 24, 2024 AHBR meeting.  
b) Question if the elevations accurately depict the grade. Staff notes the lot  
slopes to the rear.  
c) Question if a driveway extension is being proposed, revise site plan to  
depict all proposed lot improvements.  
d) Submit a floor plan for the second floor.  
Attachments:  
1727 Mayflower Lane AHBR Packet 4.10.24 Meeting  
1727 Mayflower Lane AHBR Packet 2.28.24 Meeting  
1727 Mayflower Ln AHBR Packet 9.11.24  
Legislative History  
4/10/24 Architectural & Historic Board continued  
of Review  
AHBR  
24-1013  
B.  
C.  
D.  
148 Elm Street (Historic District)  
Pavilion  
Submitted by Lydia Wolf  
a) The Secretary of Interior Standards state construction materials should be  
harmonious with historic building materials. Verify the proposed materials  
would meet this requirement.  
b) Question if a standing seam metal roof is proposed.  
Attachments:  
148 Elm St - AHBR Packet  
AHBR  
24-1025  
29 Division St (Historic District)  
Alteration - Garage Door replacements  
Submitted by Jane Anderson  
a) Staff notes the garage was constructed in 1999 and renovated in 2007.  
b) The proposed doors would have a composite cladding molded from wood  
pieces. While highly visible, the proposed doors would be appropriate,  
given the relatively recent age of the addition.  
Attachments:  
29 Division Street AHBR Packet  
AHBR 24-789  
5510 Weeping Willow Drive  
3 Seasons Room  
Submitted by Gordon Costlow  
a) Staff notes the proposal received a rear yard variance from the BZBA on  
August 15, 2024.  
b) The Architectural Design Standards state additions should be designed to  
be compatible with the main structure by incorporating materials and a  
foundation to match. Staff notes the proposed design is for an addition and  
not an open porch or deck, and therefore, would require an exposed  
foundation. Revise elevations to depict foundation to match the existing  
home around the proposed addition.  
Attachments:  
5510 Weeping Willow AHBR Packet  
AHBR 24-973  
E.  
53 First St (Pegs Foundation)  
Sign (Building)  
Submitted by John Benedict, Brilliant Electric Sign Co  
a) Suggest shifting the sign to the south so the backdrop is entirely brick.  
b) The Architectural Design Standards state “signs should have a matte  
finish, not have a glossy or reflective finish”. Verify the sign would have a  
matte finish.  
c) Question if any additional signage is planned for the building or property.  
Attachments:  
53 First St AHBR Packet  
AHBR 24-968  
F.  
7300 Valley View Road  
New House  
Submitted by Nestor Papageorge, ArtHAUS Building Company  
a) Staff notes there is an existing house on the parcel, constructed in 1966.  
The proposed home would be constructed behind the existing house. The  
existing house would be demolished once the new home construction is  
complete.  
b) Based on the complexity of the request, the board may wish to receive an  
orientation from the applicant and provide initial comments at the  
September 11th meeting and continue discussion to the September 25th  
meeting.  
c) The Architectural Design Standards state “the front setback shall not  
differ by more than ten percent from the average of the front yard setbacks  
existing on the two properties immediately adjoining the subject property,  
unless approved by the Architectural and Historic Board of Review. If one  
or more of the adjoining properties is vacant, the front yard setback shall  
be fifty feet.” Staff notes the house is proposed at a setback of two  
hundred sixty feet, while the adjacent houses one hundred twenty feet;  
however, the property has a size of approximately 5 ½ acres. The property  
is also surrounded by large acre lots in the District 2 Rural Residential  
Zoning District.  
d) The proposed home would be classified as a “Two Story Wing Type”. The  
type is described as follows: “ This type has a main body and subordinate  
wings. The main body is two stories tall and centrally located in the  
structure and the front door is located in the main body. There are one or  
two wings which are smaller in size. Wings may be one or two stories. In  
most cases, there are no significant recesses in the masses of the main  
body or wings, but there can be projections from these masses.”  
e) The Architectural Design Standards state “Wings may not be larger or  
taller than the main body of the structure, but they may be the same  
height.” Staff notes the right garage wing and the left great  
room/kitchen/dining/ wing would be larger than the central mass. Submit  
a roof plan to help evaluate this requirement.  
f) Suggest a more prominent front entryway be designed.  
g) Question if the exposed stone foundation and stone wall material would be  
consistently applied around each mass.  
h) Staff notes the site plan depicts a future outbuilding located in front of the  
proposed house. The Land Development Code (zoning) prohibits  
accessory buildings form being located in the front yard.  
Attachments:  
7300 Valley View Rd AHBR Packet  
Other Business  
VII.  
AHBR 24-734  
A.  
27 College Street (Historic)  
Addition  
Submitted by Nate Bailey, Hara Architects  
a) Staff notes the proposal was presented to the AHBR for informal review on  
August 14th, 2024. The AHBR requested a site visit with assistance from  
the historic consultant.  
b) A site visit was conducted on September 3, 2024.  
c) The consultant has submitted a report with their recommendations. In  
summary, the determination is that the proposed massing and resulting  
material loss would not be appropriate.  
Attachments:  
Consultant Report  
Revised Design  
27 College St AHBR Packet  
NPS - Preservation Brief - Additions to Historic Buildings  
Legislative History  
8/14/24 Architectural & Historic Board discussed  
of Review  
Staff Update  
VIII.  
IX.  
Adjournment  
*
*
*