City of Hudson, Ohio  
Meeting Minutes - Final  
Architectural & Historic Board of Review  
John Caputo, Chair  
Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair  
John Workley, Secretary  
John Funyak  
Françoise Massardier-Kenney  
William Ray  
Karl Wetzel  
Nicholas Sugar, City Planner  
Amanda Krickovich, Associate Planner  
Wednesday, August 23, 2023  
7:30 PM  
City Hall  
1140 Terex Road  
I.  
Call To Order  
Chair Caputo called to order the regularly scheduled meeting of the Architectural & Historic  
Board of Review of the City of Hudson at 7:30 p.m., in accordance with the Sunshine Laws of  
the State of Ohio, O.R.C. Section 121.22.  
II.  
III.  
Roll Call  
Present: 5 -  
Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley  
Mr. Funyak and Mr. Wetzel  
Absent: 2 -  
Public Comment  
Chair Caputo opened the meeting to public comments for anyone wanting to address the  
Board. There were no comments.  
IV.  
V.  
Consent Applications  
There were no Consent Applications.  
Old Business  
A.  
144 Hudson Street (Historic District)  
Addition (972sf Mater Bedroom and Great Room)  
Attachments:  
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application in the Historic District which has had an informal  
review by AHBR, and reviewed the staff comments.  
Mr. Chris Lachman, CSL Consultants and Mr. Richard Brown, LB Architects, were present  
for the meeting.  
The Board, staff and applicant discussed the applicant's willingness to use matching stone and  
bricks to comply with the standards, and the use of a metal roof.  
Mr. Workley made a motion, seconded by Mr. Ray, to approve as submitted for the  
addition with the existing house having consistent brick that is all painted. The motion  
was approved by the following vote:  
Aye:  
5 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley  
VI.  
A.  
New Business  
233 Aurora Street (Historic District)  
Fence (4’ wood split rail)  
Attachments:  
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by describing the proposed three-foot high wood  
fence and reviewing the LDC standards and staff comments.  
Ms. Amanda Keller, homeowner, the Board and staff, discussed the property as being odd  
shaped, and the height of the fence.  
A motion was made by Ms. Kenney, seconded by Mr. Workley, that this AHBR  
Application be approved. The motion carried by the following vote:  
Aye:  
5 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley  
B.  
7555 Foxdale Circle  
Accessory Structure & Addition  
Attachments:  
Ms. Krickovich introduced the proposed covered patio and reviewed the standards and staff  
comments.  
Ms. Breanna Smith, American Construction Group, the Board and staff noted the proposed  
structure will match the design of the house, the possibility of moving the structure one more  
foot from the chimney, and that this type of structure has been commonly approved.  
Mr. Workley made a motion, seconded by Ms.Kenney, to approve with moving the shed  
of the roof over one foot from the face of the pitch to maintain the existing outside  
shingle. The motion was approved by the following vote:  
Aye:  
5 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley  
C.  
7679 N Mannheim Court  
Covered Patio (Rear Yard)  
Submitted by Krystal Crisman, H&M Landscaping  
a) The application was continued from the August 23, 2023 meeting for the  
applicant to provide more detailed drawings.  
b) The architectural design standards state roofs shall not intersect so as to  
cause a valley. Question the valley that would be created between the  
proposed roof and the existing garage.  
c) Indicate the proposed roof pitch and question if it can support shingles.  
d) Question if proposed chimneys are accurately depicted on all elevations  
and renderings.  
Attachments:  
Ms. Kirckovich introduced the application for the covered patio, described the project and  
reviewed the staff comments. Ms. Kirckovich also noted that revisions have been made to the  
drawings.  
The applicants noted the drawings are out of scale and the roof will be below the window.  
The Board, staff and applicant discussed the location of the patio and roof in relation to the  
house, the type of materials and construction, and the pitch of the proposed structure not  
being the same as the existing house roof pitch. The Board stated new elevations, made to  
scale with more details need to be submitted.  
The Board tabled the application.  
This matter was continued  
VII. Other Business  
A.  
7322 Arborwood Drive  
Addition (352 Sqft Garage Expansion)  
Submitted by Len Huddleston  
a) This case went before the Board on 8/9/2023 and 8/23/2023 as informal  
reviews in order to get a general direction from the Board on massing  
requirements.  
b) The Architectural Design Standards state the front face of the main body  
must sit forward at least 18" from the front face of the wings. The existing  
garage is forward of the main body and the applicant is proposing to  
extend the existing garage by 16 feet. Staff notes the Board seemed  
acceptable of the proposed massing during the informal reviews.  
c) The Board requested the applicant provide documentation of the factors of  
a practical difficulty on the property. The applicant has provided this  
documentation. The AHBR can review in determining a special exception.  
Attachments:  
Ms. Kirkovich introduced the proposed garage extension, noted AHBR previously conducted  
an informal review on August 9, 2023, reviewed the staff comments and other work done by  
the applicant.  
Mr. Len Huddleston, LDS Contractor, and Mr. Paul Milcetich, homeowner, were present for  
application.  
The Board, applicant and staff reviewed the issues from the previous meeting including: The  
HOA prohibits detached garages,a large setback violation is created if the garage is placed in  
the rear yard, and the cul-de-sac has forward garages as a typical design.  
The applicant noted that the proposed design fits into the design of the neighborhood, the  
actual setback violation is only about two-feet, and the value of the neighborhood will be  
enhanced by the improvement made to this house. The hardships noted by the applicant are:  
The inadequate size of his garage for his vehicle which will be mitigated by the proposed  
garage, having the vehicle off the driveway will make it safer for his children and be better for  
his neighborhood.  
The Board and applicant discussed the design and setbacks of the proposed garage, the  
percentage of two and three car garages in the neighborhood, that the lot is heavily wooded,  
that a BZBA variance will be needed for the side yard, and that one tree will be removed.  
Board members also noted the proposed garage seems to fit with the general design of the  
neighborhood.  
Discussion of day and time of site visits  
B.  
A motion was made by Mr. Workley, seconded by Ms. Kenney, to establish the Tuesday  
following an AHBR meeting, at 3:00 pm, as the day and time site visits are conducted,  
with the backup day being Wednesday at 3 pm. The motion carried by the following  
vote:  
Aye:  
5 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley  
Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting:  
August 9, 2023.  
C.  
Attachments:  
A motion was made by Ms. Kenney, seconded by Mr. Workley, that the August 9, 2023,  
Minutes be approved as amended. The motion carried by the following vote:  
Aye:  
5 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley  
VIII. Staff Update  
Ms. Kirkovich noted the Heritage Ohio annual conference is October 10 to 12 in Dayton and  
Board members are welcome to attend at their own expense.  
Ms. Kenney questioned why a canvas awning was not allowed on a previous application. The  
Board discussed why they believed canvas did not fit with the existing metal awnings at that  
particular location. Ms. Kenney also discussed polycarbonate being used as an awning  
material with the benefit of allowing light to pass through. The Board discussed the use of  
polycarbonate on a case by case basis depending on the view for the general public and it  
possibly being prohibited because it is a combustible material.  
IX.  
Adjournment  
A motion was made by Ms. Kenney, seconded by Mr. Workley, that the meeting be  
adjourned at 8:59 p.m.. The motion carried by an unanimous vote.  
___________________________________________  
John Caputo, Chair  
___________________________________________  
John Workley, Secretary  
___________________________________________  
Joe Campbell, Executive Assistant  
Upon approval by the Architectural & Historic Board of Review, this official written  
summary of the meeting minutes shall become a permanent record, and the official minutes  
shall also consist of a permanent audio and video recording, excluding executive sessions, in  
accordance with Codified Ordinances, Section 252.04, Minutes of Architectural and Historic  
Board of Review, Board of Zoning and Building Appeals, and Planning Commission.