E.
Addition (Dining Room & Kitchen)
Attachments:
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying and explaining the elevations and
reviewing the staff comments.
Mr. Nate Bailey, Hara Architects, noted the roofing can be made to match in pitch and
materials, that the proposed shed roof is to accommodate second floor windows, that the
addition roofline will be above the existing roofline, that casement windows are preferred
since there are no neighbors in the rear to see them, and that the head heights of the doors and
windows are in alignment except for the window above the sink.
Ms. Marzulla moved to approve, seconded by Mr. Ray, with the overhanging roof
having asphalt shingles. The motion was approved by the following vote:
Aye:
6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley and Ms.
Sredinski
F.
Addition (Attached Garage)
Attachments:
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying and describing the project including
the revised drawing, and reviewing the staff comments.
Mr. Nate Bailey, Hara Architects, and Mr. Charles Walton, homeowner, described: The
additional fenestration and why fenestration was not added to the master bedroom, the
possibility of moving the bathroom window over approximately two-feet to lessen the
fenestration issue, that the full width of a column be used against the house to support the
material change, and that the standing seam material is being used because of the aesthetics of
the material and it will be invisible from the street. With regard to the height of the wings Mr.
Bailey noted this is a detached garage, the existing house is one story, and he displayed
renderings that show the garage from many angles cannot be seen above the house, and
presented documents showing the neighbors support the project.
The Board, Mr. Bailey, and staff discussed: Mr. Bailey's responses to the staff comments, that
moving the bathroom windows will reduce the fenestration gap to 14-feet, that a window can
be added to the north elevation, that the roof will be reshingled, that there will not be a living
space above the garage, that the addition height is appropriate considering the house is one
story, the distance of the house from the street, the possibility of the porch and roof being one
pitch, and that the valley created by the two rooflines is not permitted.
Mr. Bailey requested the application be approved, aside from the roofline, which could be
approved by staff.
Ms. Kenney made a motion, seconded by Mr. Ray, for a partial approval of the
application with the following conditions and findings: A window be added on the north
elevation, columns be placed against the house at the front entrance material change,
that the transition from the shingle to metal roofs are complementary, and an exception
to the addition height requirement is given because of the separation between the house
and garage, the single story house has a low height, the structure is 100-feet from the
road, and the siteline makes the addition not visible. Ms. Kenney also moved that an
administrative review be conducted to approve the rooflines. The motion was approved
by the following vote:
Aye:
6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley and Ms.
Sredinski
