City of Hudson, Ohio  
CD Meeting Agenda - Final  
Architectural & Historic Board of Review  
John Caputo, Chair  
Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair  
John Workley, Secretary  
Amy Manko  
Françoise Massardier-Kenney  
William Ray  
Jamie Sredinski  
Nicholas Sugar, City Planner  
Amanda Krickovich, Associate Planner  
Wednesday, February 26, 2025  
7:30 PM  
Town Hall  
27 East Main Street  
Call To Order  
Roll Call  
I.  
II.  
III.  
Public Comment  
Consent Applications  
IV.  
A.  
172 Aurora Street (Historic District)  
Fence (6-foot, Cedar)  
Submitted by David Moorhead  
a) Staff recommends approval as submitted.  
Attachments:  
B.  
5947 Laurawood Lane  
Accessory Structure (Shed)  
Submitted by Andrew Stegmeier  
a) Staff recommends approval as submitted.  
Attachments:  
Old Business  
V.  
A.  
16 Owen Brown Street (Historic District)  
Addition & Alterations (Bedrooms, Dining room & porches)  
Submitted by Mark Madar  
a) Staff notes this project was reviewed at the February 12th AHBR meeting.  
The Board conducted a site visit on February 18th and requested  
assistance from the consultant.  
b) The consultant report is attached for the Board to review. The applicant  
has requested to attend the meeting to discuss the project with the Board.  
Attachments:  
Legislative History  
2/12/25 Architectural & Historic Board continued  
of Review  
New Business  
VI.  
A.  
145 Aurora Street (Historic District)  
Accessory Structure (Detached Garage)  
Submitted by Kody Kocias, Peninsula Architects  
a) Staff notes the applicant is proposing to remove the existing detached  
garage and construct a new detached garage. Question the age of the  
existing garage and if it is contributing to the Historic District and  
appropriate to remove. Submit existing photos of the detached garage by  
2/24/25 in order to provide time to review.  
b) Section I-2 of the Architectural Design Standards state “New buildings  
and alterations shall respect the existing context and framework. The  
design of any building shall be judged in reference to its site and the  
character of its surroundings, not as an independent object. The site plan  
for all new buildings shall be prepared with a clear understanding of the  
framework that exists or is being created in a particular area, through  
development standards, zoning and other regulations.” Staff notes the  
existing garage was lower in height and setback farther from the side  
property line. Question if the new garage should depict a lower height to  
better accommodate existing and surrounding site conditions or could be  
set back to maintain a similar footprint.  
c) Section III-1(d)(2) of the Architectural Design Standards state “Enclosed  
accessory buildings shall incorporate some elements similar to the main  
body, for example similar corner boards, window types, or materials.”  
Revise elevations to note materials and how they relate to the existing  
house.  
d) Section III-1(d)(5) of the Architectural Design Standards state “All facades  
(including the rear) over twelve (12) feet long shall have at least one  
window or door opening. Fenestration placement on the accessory  
structure shall be proportional to the house.” Question the window  
arrangement on the right elevation.  
e) Section III-1(g)(3) of the Architectural Design Standards state “Exposed  
foundations and tie courses shall be of a consistent material on all  
elevations.” Question the exposed foundation on the left elevation.  
f) Submit specification sheets of siding, roof, window and door materials.  
g) A survey would be required to confirm setbacks before final approval.  
Attachments:  
B.  
252 North Main Street (Historic District)  
Addition & Alteration to Accessory Structure (Barn)  
Submitted by Stuart Hamilton  
a) Staff notes the applicant is proposing to add two open roof porches to both  
sides of the existing barn, remove/add windows and doors and remove the  
horizonal wood exposed foundation and replace with vertical siding to  
match the existing.  
b) Appendix 1(6) of the Secretary of Interior Standards state “Deteriorated  
historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity  
of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new  
feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual  
qualities and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features  
shall be substantiated by documentary, physical, or pictorial evidence.”  
The applicant is proposing to utilize existing materials and repurpose  
windows and doors. Question how the windows will be removed and  
replaced with existing siding.  
c) Appendix 1(9) of the Secretary of Interior Standards states “New  
additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not  
destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work  
shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the  
massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic  
integrity of the property and its environment.” Staff notes the proposal  
would impact the historic siding on the barn.  
d) Section III-1(g)(5) of the Architectural Design Standards state “All decks  
and porches without a perimeter foundation exposing more than eighteen  
(18) inches between the facia and the grade must be screened with  
compatible materials or landscaping unless a full story is exposed below.”  
Revise plans to depict skirting or landscaping in order to meet this  
requirement.  
e) Question if a railing would be required with the Summit County Building  
Department.  
Attachments:  
C.  
7559 Andover Way  
Addition (3 Seasons Room)  
Submitted by Andrew Kender  
a) Section IV-4(g)(3) of the Architectural Design Standards state “Materials  
used on an open porch or screen room need not be the same as other  
materials in the structure, but should be related to materials used in the  
details of the structure.” Staff notes the applicant is replacing the existing  
screens with glass windows, which would create an enclosed glass porch.  
b) Section IV-4(h)(3) of the Architectural Design Standards state “Additions  
should be designed to be compatible with the main structure by  
incorporating materials and a foundation to match.” Question if the  
design could be revised to include the appearance of an exposed  
foundation with applied brick veneer to match the house or by extending  
the deck around the mass.  
c) Section III-1(g)(11) of the Architectural Design Standards state  
“Replacement wall and roof materials should be blended across a facade  
(rather than small patch areas) to ensure compatibility with existing  
materials.” Question how the existing roof shingle will blend with the new  
material.  
d) Submit an elevation drawing of the left side of the proposed addition.  
Attachments:  
Other Business  
VII.  
A.  
Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting:  
February 12, 2025.  
Attachments:  
Staff Update  
VIII.  
IX.  
Adjournment  
*
*
*