A.
Alteration (Siding Replacement)
Attachments:
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying the house, describing the project,
reviewing the applicable LDC, and staff comments.
Mr. Brad Hoder, manufacturer's representative and the Board discussed the areas on the front
of the house the LDC would allow board and batten siding, and that if the siding terminates at
an inside corner it could be administratively approved.
Mr. Hoder stated he will discuss this with the homeowners.
This matter was discussed
B.
Alterations (Windows)
Attachments:
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by noting the project was approved in August of
2021, reviewing the changes from the previous approval, and the design standards regarding
fenestration every twelve feet.
Mr. John Bolovan, homeowner, stated a dormer will be added at a future time when finances
allow, that a window on the east side will lessen security, that the rear western gable location
will eventually have a chimney, and the eastern gable area will be for a workshop where a
blank interior wall is desired, Mr. Bolovan also believes a trellis will look nicer than a
window on this wall and stated that the house has been transformed from a run down not
improved house to its present state with plans to become better and better.
The Board, applicant, and staff discussed: The chimney that was previously approved to be
removed, the requirement that work must be completed within one year of permit issuance -
with the possibility of a six-month extension, replacing the three windows with a trellis while
noting the house is on a large property and there are no neighbors who will see the back of the
house, the Board's concern over having areas that will have a trellis instead of windows, that if
wood trim is placed around the trellises it will give a better look, faux windows in place of the
trellises, that architectural details have been allowed in the past to satisfy the fenestration
requirement, and that a minimum of 4-inch trim be used as the trellis picture frame trim.
Mr. Workley made a motion, seconded by Mr. Ray, to deny the removal of the dormer
so as to allow a time frame to reinstall the dormer, and to approve the trellises at three
locations, with a minimum of four-inch trim to picture frame the trellises. The motion
was approved by the following vote:
Aye:
Nay:
6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Manko
1 - Ms. Marzulla