City of Hudson, Ohio  
CD Meeting Agenda - Final  
Architectural & Historic Board of Review  
John Caputo, Chair  
Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair  
John Workley, Secretary  
Andrew Brown  
Amy Manko  
Françoise Massardier-Kenney  
Jamie Sredinski  
Nicholas Sugar, City Planner  
Lauren Coffman, Associate Planner  
Wednesday, September 24, 2025  
7:30 PM  
Town Hall  
27 East Main Street  
Call To Order  
Roll Call  
I.  
II.  
III.  
Public Comment  
Consent Applications  
IV.  
A.  
190 W Streetsboro St  
Sign (Ground Sign)  
Submitted by Splott Graphics  
a) Staff recommends approval as submitted.  
Attachments:  
Old Business  
V.  
A.  
176 Elm St (Historic District)  
Alterations (Siding, Window Trim & Shutters)  
Submitted by Reuben Yoder  
Staff notes a site visit was held on September 3, 2025.  
The AHBR requested the review of the Architectural consultant to visit the site,  
consider if the home is contributing to the Historic District and whether or  
not the proposed siding materials are appropriate. The consultant’s report  
and recommendation is attached for the Board’s consideration.  
Attachments:  
Legislative History  
8/27/25 Architectural & Historic Board continued  
of Review  
9/10/25  
Architectural & Historic Board continued  
of Review  
New Business  
VI.  
A.  
72 N Main Street (Historic District)  
Commercial Sign (Hanging Sign)  
Submitted by Marie Cipolletta, Signarama  
a) Section V-5(c)(3) states “Signs should have a matte finish, not have a  
glossy or reflective finish.” Verify a matte finish.  
b) Question how proposed materials and design are compatible with the  
surrounding signs. Staff recommends the sign be constructed of High  
Density Urethane (HDU) or wood, similar to the other surrounding  
hanging signs.  
Attachments:  
B.  
C.  
98 N Main St (Historic District)  
Sign (Wall & Hanging Sign)  
Submitted by Melanie Brunty  
a) Revise submitted elevations to verify proposed materials, dimensions, and  
finish would match the existing signage.  
Attachments:  
38 Church St (Historic District)  
Fence (6-foot privacy)  
Submitted by Jeff Becka, R&T Fence Inc  
Question if the proposed fence would abut any existing fences.  
Attachments:  
Legislative History  
9/10/25  
Architectural & Historic Board continued  
of Review  
D.  
130 Elm St  
Alteration (Roof Replacement)  
Submitted by Bill Buehl, A&B Roofing  
a) Verify the existing roof material and if there are any differences in  
proposed material.  
b) Question how materials would blend with the existing roof shingles.  
Attachments:  
E.  
31 Church Street (Historic District)  
Alteration (Window Replacements)  
Submitted by Pavlo Puts  
a) The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation state that  
deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced.  
Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive  
feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and  
other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Replacement of  
missing features shall be substantiated by documentary, physical, or  
pictorial evidence. Provide documentation verifying the need for  
replacement.  
b) Staff notes Pella Lifestyle windows are proposed, as well as composite  
doors. Revise the proposed door to wood and question the Pella Lifestyle  
as a replacement for historic wood windows. Staff notes the Pella  
Architectural Series is typically preferred as a replacement.  
Attachments:  
F.  
358 Oldham Way  
Addition (3 Seasons Room)  
Submitted by Dylan Hart, Portage Timberworks  
a) Section IV-4 of the Architectural Design Standards state that Additions  
should be designed to be compatible with the main structure by  
incorporating materials and a foundation to match. Revise elevations to  
depict full foundation to match the existing home.  
b) Submit product spec sheets of all proposed external materials.  
Attachments:  
G.  
85 Division Street (Historic District)  
Addition (Bedroom)  
Submitted by Johnathan Flemming  
a) Question age of the existing rear wing addition.  
b) Question if the gables and window trim are accurately depicted in the  
submitted elevations.  
c) The National Park Service Preservation Brief for additions states new  
additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not  
destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work  
shall be differentiated from the old. Question impact of proposed addition  
on the historic mass and the removal of historic materials. Suggest  
insetting the addition or creating a clearer transition point to create a  
visible break between masses.  
d) The National Park Service Preservation Brief for additions states new  
additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in  
such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and  
integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired.  
Question the removal of a portion of the rear roofline and facade to  
accommodate the proposed addition.  
e) Question how siding would be blended on the east elevation.  
f) Submit spec sheets of all proposed exterior materials.  
Attachments:  
Other Business  
VII.  
Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting:  
September 10, 2025.  
Attachments:  
Staff Update  
VIII.  
IX.  
Adjournment  
*
*
*