City of Hudson, Ohio  
CD Meeting Agenda - Final  
Architectural & Historic Board of Review  
John Caputo, Chair  
Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair  
John Workley, Secretary  
Françoise Massardier-Kenney  
William Ray  
Jamie Sredinski  
Nicholas Sugar, City Planner  
Amanda Krickovich, Associate Planner  
Wednesday, January 22, 2025  
7:30 PM  
Town Hall  
27 East Main Street  
Call To Order  
Roll Call  
I.  
II.  
III.  
Public Comment  
Consent Applications  
IV.  
A.  
56 College Street (Historic District)  
Fence (Wood 4’ & 6’)  
Submitted by Chris Lachman  
a) Staff recommends approval as submitted.  
Attachments:  
Old Business  
V.  
New Business  
VI.  
A.  
333 Aurora Street  
Addition (Attached Garage)  
Submitted by Joseph Franzese  
a) Staff notes this project was reviewed by the AHBR informally at the  
November 13, 2024 meeting.  
b) Staff noted conflicts with Section IV-2(b)(1) of the Architectural Design  
Standards, which states rear wings may not be larger or taller than the  
main body of the structure, but they may be the same height. The proposed  
addition is approximately 2,670 square feet and the main body of the  
existing house is approximately 1,130 square feet. Additionally, staff notes  
the house is approximately 180 feet from the street and the addition is  
approximately 240 feet from the street.  
c) Section IV-4(e)(4) of the Architectural Design Standards state the building  
shall have a typical window used for most windows. Question the use of  
casement and double hung windows on the addition.  
d) Section IV-4(d)(3) of the Architectural Design Standards state the  
materials used in any mass must be applied consistently on that mass on  
all sides of the structure. Question the vertical and horizontal siding on the  
south and east elevations.  
e) Staff notes Section II-1 - Approval and discretion of the AHBR:  
c. The AHBR may waive any requirement of these standards in order to  
approve a proposed project, if the AHBR finds that the project fulfills the  
five principals enumerated in Section I-2, and meets one of the following  
conditions:  
(1) The project is an exceptional design, meaning that it is either  
especially creative or it is designed in response to unique situation, such as  
a very difficult site or an unusual program requirement.  
Or  
(2) Exceptional and unique conditions exist that create a practical  
difficulty in complying with the requirements of these Standards. The  
AHBR should consider the factors enumerated in as defined in the Land  
Development Code in determining "practical difficulty"  
Attachments:  
Legislative History  
11/13/24 Architectural & Historic Board discussed  
of Review  
B.  
171 Brentwood Drive  
Alteration (Siding Replacement)  
Submitted by Patrick Nussbeck  
a) Section IV(1(d)(2) of the Architectural Design Standards state - The  
materials used in the main body must be applied consistently on that mass  
on all sides of the structure. Staff notes the applicant is proposing board  
and batten siding that would not be applied around the entire mass.  
b) Section IV-4(d)(1) of the Architectural Design Standards states a different  
material may be used on building projection gable ends, entrance recesses,  
or to emphasize the horizontal or vertical divisions of the building. Suggest  
revising to only depict the proposed board and batten siding along the  
entrance recess.  
Attachments:  
Other Business  
VII.  
A.  
Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting:  
January 8, 2025.  
Attachments:  
Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Workshop  
Meeting: December 3, 2024.  
B.  
Attachments:  
Staff Update  
VIII.  
IX.  
Adjournment  
*
*
*