B.
50 Division Street (Historic District)
Alterations (Door)
Submitted by James Field
a) This case went to the AHBR on January 10, 2023. The Board continued
the project so that the applicant could have more time to explore cost
estimates for a door material that would be more appropriate for the
Historic District.
b) The applicant has submitted additional documentation in response to the
AHBR request.
Attachments:
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by showing photos of the existing doors, and
reviewing the staff comments.
Mr. James Field, and Mr. Eric Chupak, Temple Beth Shalom, were present for the meeting. In
order to provide context to the request Mr. Field reviewed an email from December 26, 2023,
which threatened members of the synagogue. He then presented a security review of the
temple, noted FEMA grants for security upgrades, noted this addition was built in 1955 and
stated he believes the existing door is off-the-shelf and not historical, stated the requested
door was recommended by the Jewish Federation and the Hudson Police Department, noted a
wood door with a steel core would be approximately $20,000 instead of approximately $3000
for the proposed door, and reviewed other threats against synagogues in the area.
The Board, applicant and staff discussed: A wood laminated steel core door, that the cost
factor my be considered by AHBR, that the lower level ground floor windows are a security
concern, the protective film over the windows and that replacement of the windows on the
addition may be considered at some point, how the building looks in historical photos, the
Board's desire to see a quote and specifications for a metal core wood clad door, that the
building is built on the property line which creates setback issues for new construction, that
the proposed doors closely match the front doors, that a door with no window makes
answering the door more difficult, and the nature of the safety glass.
The Board decided to continue the meeting to the following AHBR meeting and requested the
applicant bring in a quote for a steel core wood door.
This matter was continued
C.
Additions (Second floor bathroom, screened rear porch)
Attachments:
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying the site plan and elevations,
describing the project and reviewing the staff comments.
Ms. Steffany Wechter, homeowner, noted that brick to match will be used on the chimney, the
skirting will be made to match, and that the drawings will be corrected.
A motion was made by Ms. Marzulla, seconded by Mr. Ray, that this AHBR
Application be approved as amended with the drawings resubmitted to staff showing a
brick to match chimney and the skirting corrected. The motion carried by the following
vote: