City of Hudson, Ohio  
Meeting Minutes - Final  
Architectural & Historic Board of Review  
John Caputo, Chair  
Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair  
John Workley, Secretary  
John Funyak  
Françoise Massardier-Kenney  
William Ray  
Karl Wetzel  
Nicholas Sugar, City Planner  
Amanda Krickovich, Associate Planner  
Wednesday, January 10, 2024  
7:30 PM  
Town Hall  
27 East Main Street  
I.  
Call To Order  
Chair Caputo called to order the regularly scheduled meeting of the Architectural & Historic  
Board of Review of the City of Hudson at 7:30 p.m., in accordance with the Sunshine Laws of  
the State of Ohio, O.R.C. Section 121.22.  
II.  
III.  
Roll Call  
Present: 6 -  
Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Wetzel and Mr. Workley  
Ms. Kenney  
Absent: 1 -  
Election of Officers & Industrial Design Committee  
Ms. Marzulla nominated Mr. Workley for the position of Secretary, Mr. Ray seconded the  
motion. Mr. Workley was elected by a unanimous vote.  
Mr. Workley nominated Ms. Marzulla for the position of Vice-Chair, Mr. Funyak seconded  
the motion. Ms. Marzulla was elected by a unanimous vote.  
Ms. Marzulla nominated Mr. Caputo for the position of Chair, Mr. Workley seconded the  
motion. Mr. Caputo was elected by a unanimous vote.  
Chair Cupato appointed Ms. Marzulla and Mr. Workley to the Industrial Design  
Subcommittee.  
Elections and appointments took place.  
IV.  
Public Comment  
Chair Caputo opened the meeting to public comments for anyone wanting to address the  
Board.  
Ms. Amy McCormick, 142 S. Main Street, commented in support of the application for a new  
door at Temple Beth Shalom because of recent hostilities against Jewish people and her  
interest in the historic architecture and safety for the citizens of Hudson.  
This matter was discussed  
V.  
A.  
Consent Applications  
A motion was made by Mr. Workley, seconded by Ms. Marzulla, to approve the Consent  
Agenda. The motion carried by the following vote:  
Aye:  
6 - Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Wetzel and Mr. Workley  
90 Aurora St. (Historic District)  
Fence (6’ wood, rear yard)  
Attachments:  
This AHBR application was approved on the Consent Agenda.  
VI.  
Old Business  
There was no Old Business.  
VII. New Business  
A.  
29 Division St. (Historic District)  
Alteration (Patio Doors)  
Attachments:  
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying photos of the patio door, explaining  
the project and reviewing the staff comments.  
Mr. Jared Crowe, Alair Homes, described the deterioration of the existing replacement door  
which is not original to the house and is part of an addition. The applicant confirmed the  
proposed patio doors will have simulated divided lights.  
A motion was made by Mr. Ray, seconded by Mr. Workley, that this AHBR Application  
be approved. The motion carried by the following vote:  
Aye:  
6 - Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Wetzel and Mr. Workley  
B.  
50 Division Street (Historic District)  
Alterations (Door)  
Submitted by James Field  
a) This case went to the AHBR on January 10, 2023. The Board continued  
the project so that the applicant could have more time to explore cost  
estimates for a door material that would be more appropriate for the  
Historic District.  
b) The applicant has submitted additional documentation in response to the  
AHBR request.  
Attachments:  
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by showing photos of the existing doors, and  
reviewing the staff comments.  
Mr. James Field, and Mr. Eric Chupak, Temple Beth Shalom, were present for the meeting. In  
order to provide context to the request Mr. Field reviewed an email from December 26, 2023,  
which threatened members of the synagogue. He then presented a security review of the  
temple, noted FEMA grants for security upgrades, noted this addition was built in 1955 and  
stated he believes the existing door is off-the-shelf and not historical, stated the requested  
door was recommended by the Jewish Federation and the Hudson Police Department, noted a  
wood door with a steel core would be approximately $20,000 instead of approximately $3000  
for the proposed door, and reviewed other threats against synagogues in the area.  
The Board, applicant and staff discussed: A wood laminated steel core door, that the cost  
factor my be considered by AHBR, that the lower level ground floor windows are a security  
concern, the protective film over the windows and that replacement of the windows on the  
addition may be considered at some point, how the building looks in historical photos, the  
Board's desire to see a quote and specifications for a metal core wood clad door, that the  
building is built on the property line which creates setback issues for new construction, that  
the proposed doors closely match the front doors, that a door with no window makes  
answering the door more difficult, and the nature of the safety glass.  
The Board decided to continue the meeting to the following AHBR meeting and requested the  
applicant bring in a quote for a steel core wood door.  
This matter was continued  
C.  
7446 Hudson Park Dr.  
Additions (Second floor bathroom, screened rear porch)  
Attachments:  
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying the site plan and elevations,  
describing the project and reviewing the staff comments.  
Ms. Steffany Wechter, homeowner, noted that brick to match will be used on the chimney, the  
skirting will be made to match, and that the drawings will be corrected.  
A motion was made by Ms. Marzulla, seconded by Mr. Ray, that this AHBR  
Application be approved as amended with the drawings resubmitted to staff showing a  
brick to match chimney and the skirting corrected. The motion carried by the following  
vote:  
Aye:  
6 - Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Wetzel and Mr. Workley  
D.  
14 Stokes Lane  
Addition & Alterations (Second floor, 533sqft)  
Attachments:  
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying the elevations, describing the project  
and reviewing the staff comments.  
Mr. Nate Bailey, Hara Architects, and Mr. Scott Verlinger, homeowner, noted: The staff  
comment regarding shutters will be complied with, the low slope addition roof is intended to  
respect the existing house with the roof material not being seen, the siding will blend into the  
existing siding, the alignment of the windows on the side is difficult because it is in the  
owners bathroom with other fixtures.  
The Board, staff and applicant discussed the different size of the window in the bathroom, the  
possibility of using an irregular window, the lack of fenestration, moving the window into the  
closet, moving the sink and window location, that the membrane roof is flat, that the dormer  
might be lowered a few inches, that the house is not visible from the Rt. 91, and that the roof  
will be mechanically attached.  
A motion was made by Mr. Workley, seconded by Mr. Ray, that this AHBR Application  
be approved as amended with the sink and window on the east elevation switched. The  
motion carried by the following vote:  
Aye:  
6 - Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Wetzel and Mr. Workley  
VIII. Other Business  
Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting:  
December 13, 2023.  
A.  
Attachments:  
A motion was made by Ms. Marzulla, seconded by Mr. Workley, that the December 13,  
2023, Minutes be approved as submitted. The motion carried by the following vote:  
Aye:  
6 - Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Wetzel and Mr. Workley  
IX.  
X.  
Staff Update  
Adjournment  
There were no staff updates.  
A motion was made by Ms. Marzulla, seconded by Mr. Workley, that this be adjourned  
at 8:38 pm. The motion carried by an unanimous vote.  
___________________________________________  
John Caputo, Chair  
___________________________________________  
John Workley, Secretary  
___________________________________________  
Joe Campbell, Executive Assistant  
Upon approval by the Architectural & Historic Board of Review, this official written  
summary of the meeting minutes shall become a permanent record, and the official minutes  
shall also consist of a permanent audio and video recording, excluding executive sessions, in  
accordance with Codified Ordinances, Section 252.04, Minutes of Architectural and Historic  
Board of Review, Board of Zoning and Building Appeals, and Planning Commission.  
*
*
*