City of Hudson, Ohio  
CD Meeting Agenda - Final  
Architectural & Historic Board of Review  
John Caputo, Chair  
Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair  
John Workley, Secretary  
Françoise Massardier-Kenney  
William Ray  
Jamie Sredinski  
Karl Wetzel  
Nicholas Sugar, City Planner  
Amanda Krickovich, Associate Planner  
Wednesday, December 11, 2024  
7:30 PM  
Town Hall  
27 East Main Street  
Call To Order  
Roll Call  
I.  
II.  
III.  
Public Comment  
Consent Applications  
IV.  
A.  
41 Ambrose Drive  
Accessory Structure (Pavillion)  
Submitted by Jeff Rak  
a) Staff recommends approval as submitted.  
Attachments:  
Old Business  
V.  
A.  
13 N. Oviatt (Historic District)  
Demolition (One Story, Single-Family House)  
Submitted by Clayton Braham  
a) Staff notes this proposal was reviewed at the May 8, 2024 AHBR meeting.  
The Board requested the assistance from the Consultant. The Consultant  
report concluded the existing house falls within the Period of Significance  
of the Historic District (1806-1963) and therefore, demolition would not be  
appropriate. The Consultant report cited the 2022 Historic District  
Boundary Increase, which added the building as a contributing resource,  
along with 38 other buildings built between 1940 and 1963.  
b) Staff notes the application was further reviewed at the November 13, 2024  
AHBR meeting. The Board requested a site visit which was conducted on  
November 19th, 2024.  
c) The applicant has submitted additional documentation for the AHBR to  
consider.  
Attachments:  
Legislative History  
5/8/24  
Architectural & Historic Board continued  
of Review  
11/13/24  
Architectural & Historic Board continued  
of Review  
New Business  
VI.  
A.  
190 N. Main Street (Historic District)  
Sign (Building Sign)  
Submitted by Robert Riegle  
a) Question the thickness of the letters and how they will be mounted to the  
wall.  
b) Verify if the holes from the previous sign will need to be patched.  
Attachments:  
B.  
48 College Street (Historic District)  
Alterations (Windows & Doors)  
Submitted by Elizabeth Nicklas, Peninsula Architects  
a) Staff notes this project was reviewed at the October 23, 2024 & the  
November 13, 2024 AHBR meetings. At the 11/13 meeting the Board  
approved the addition, but allowed the applicant to re-submit plans that  
would depict a design that is more aligned with the Consultant report.  
b) Staff notes the consultant report recommended removing the flanking  
window and replacing with a double hung, retaining the historic door  
opening and the farthest right (south) window. The applicant has submitted  
revised plans that depict removing the flanking window and replace with  
ganged double hung windows, retain the historic door opening, widening it  
and replacing with double doors and removing the right window and  
replacing with ganged double hung. However, staff notes the windows and  
doors would not align with the second-floor windows, which conflicts with  
the Consultant’s recommendation.  
Attachments:  
C.  
7181 Huntington Road  
Alterations (Siding)  
Submitted by WeatherSeal Home Services, Inc.  
a) The proposal is for siding replacement only. The applicant will apply  
separately for the roofed porch.  
b) The Architectural Design Standards state as per Section IV-1(d)(2) - The  
materials used in the main body must be applied consistently on that mass  
on all sides of the structure. Staff notes the applicant is proposing board  
and batten siding that does not wrap around the entire mass. Revise plans  
to depict a more consistent material on all sides of the mass.  
Attachments:  
D.  
61 Sussex Road  
Addition (Attached Garage)  
Submitted by Steve Hanna  
a) Staff notes this project was reviewed by the AHBR informally at the  
October 9, 2024 meeting. Additionally, the project was granted a BZBA  
variance for a forward-facing garage door on November 21, 2024.  
b) Section III-1(a)(4) of the Architectural Design Standards states - Attached  
garages shall not face the street except for new development with a front  
yard depth of 130 feet or more.  
c) Section IV-3(a) of the Architectural Design Standards states - The main  
body is a single story and centrally located in the structure and the front  
door is located in the main body. Staff notes the addition would create a  
main body that is not centrally located.  
d) During the informal review the Board members generally accepted the  
plans but suggested a garage door that had a higher degree of  
architectural features. The new garage door elevation is attached in the  
packet.  
e) Staff notes Section II-1 - Approval and discretion of the AHBR:  
c. The AHBR may waive any requirement of these standards in order to  
approve a proposed project, if the AHBR finds that the project fulfills the  
five principals enumerated in Section I-2, and meets one of the following  
conditions:  
(1) The project is an exceptional design, meaning that it is either  
especially creative or it is designed in response to unique situation,  
such as a very difficult site or an unusual program requirement.  
Or  
(2) Exceptional and unique conditions exist that create a practical  
difficulty in complying with the requirements of these Standards. The  
AHBR should consider the factors enumerated in as defined in the  
Land Development Code in determining "practical difficulty"  
Attachments:  
E.  
48 Wellgate Drive  
Addition (Mudroom & Garage)  
Submitted by Nate Bailey, Hara Architects  
a) Section IV-4(c) of the Architectural Design Standards state - All roofs in  
all the wings must be of the same shape as the main body, but they may  
have a different pitch or orientation. Roofs shall not intersect a wall so as  
to cause a valley. Staff notes the existing house has a mansard roof and the  
proposed addition is depicted to have a flat roof. Revise plans to depict the  
addition to have the same type of roof shape as the main body.  
b) Section III-1(g)(11) of the Architectural Design Standards states -  
Replacement wall and roof materials should be blended across a facade  
(rather than small patch areas) to ensure compatibility with existing  
materials. Confirm how the siding will be blended in at the rear and east  
elevations and at the window replacement infills.  
c) Submit a roof plan to verify massing.  
Attachments:  
F.  
2 Bradley Drive  
New House (Single-Family Detached)  
Submitted by Nate Bailey, Hara Architects  
a) Staff notes the overall design of the house would not comply with the  
permitted building types within District 4 per Section II-2. Revise the plans  
to depict a more traditional two-story wing type by removing the overhang  
and creating a pitched roof off of the main mass.  
b) Section I-2(e) of the Architectural Design Standards state - New buildings  
and alterations shall respect the existing context and framework. The  
design of any building shall be judged in reference to its site and the  
character of its surroundings, not as an independent object. Suggest  
revising the plans to depict more traditional overhangs, eaves, siding and  
window openings that would be more compatible with neighboring  
properties.  
c) Section III-1(g)(8) of the Architectural Design Standards state - Large  
expanses of blank wall are to be avoided. Fenestration placement should  
be at a maximum of approximately every 12 feet. Adjust window  
placements to meet this requirement.  
d) Section III-1(d)(5) of the Architectural Design Standards state - All  
facades (including the rear) over twelve (12) feet long shall have at least  
one window or door opening. Fenestration placement on the accessory  
structure shall be proportional to the house. Revise accessory structure  
plans to show fenestration on the rear elevation to meet this requirement.  
Attachments:  
G.  
734 Barlow Rd  
New Residential Construction (Two-story single-family house)  
Submitted by Robyn Jones  
a) Section 1205.05(d)(7)(2) of the Land Development Code states - The front  
wall of the principal structure shall be parallel to the street or  
perpendicular to a radius of the curve of the street extended through the  
approximate center of the main mass, if the street is curved. Revise the  
orientation of the house to meet this requirement.  
b) Section 1205.05(d)(5)(C)(2) of the Land Development Code states - The  
front setback shall not differ by more than ten percent from the average of  
the front yard setbacks existing on the two properties immediately  
adjoining the subject property, unless approved by the Architectural and  
Historic Board of Review. Staff notes the proposed setback is greater than  
ten percent of the adjacent properties 86 ft average.  
c) Section IV-1(e)(3) of the Architectural Design Standards state - The  
building shall have a typical window used for most windows. Utilize a  
more consistent window design to meet this requirement.  
d) Section III-1 (g)(8) of the Architectural Design Standards state - Large  
expanses of blank wall are to be avoided. Fenestration placement should  
be at a maximum of approximately every 12 feet. Add additional  
fenestration on the right elevation to meet this requirement.  
e) Section IV-2(g)(1) of the Architectural Design Standards state - Roofs on  
projections should match the roof material of the building, and to the  
extent possible, shall be same kind of roof. Natural finish metals such as  
copper, terne coated steel, or lead may be substituted for any roofing  
material. Staff notes the house is a hip roof and the porch projections are  
gable roofs.  
f) Question if the stone applied to the rear elevation wall would terminate at  
an inside corner.  
g) Question the mix of standing seam and shingles at the front porch.  
Attachments:  
Other Business  
VII.  
A.  
Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting:  
November 13, 2024.  
Attachments:  
Staff Update  
VIII.  
A.  
Discussion on the 2025 Council check-in  
Attachments:  
Adjournment  
IX.  
*
*
*