City of Hudson, Ohio  
CD Meeting Agenda - Final  
Architectural & Historic Board of Review  
John Caputo, Chair  
Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair  
John Workley, Secretary  
Andrew Brown  
Françoise Massardier-Kenney  
Jamie Sredinski  
Nicholas Sugar, City Planner  
Lauren Coffman, Associate Planner  
Wednesday, July 22, 2026  
7:30 PM  
Town Hall  
27 East Main Street  
Call To Order  
Roll Call  
I.  
II.  
III.  
IV.  
Public Comment  
Consent Applications  
356 N. Main Street (Historic District)  
Alteration (Roof Replacement)  
Submitted by Bill Buehl  
a) Staff recommends approval as submitted.  
Attachments:  
Old Business  
V.  
7400 Valerie Ln  
Addition (Sunroom)  
Submitted by John Caputo  
a) Section IV-4 (h)(3) of the Architectural Design Standards states that  
additions should be designed to be compatible with the main structure by  
incorporating materials and a foundation to match. Question if proposed  
foundation material will match the existing house.  
Attachments:  
New Business  
VI.  
150 Aurora Street (Historic District)  
Accessory Structure (Detached Garage)  
Submitted by Eric Kuczek  
a) Revise submitted site plan to depict impervious surface calculations.  
b) Section III-1 (d)(2) of the Architectural Design Standards state that  
enclosed accessory buildings shall incorporate some elements similar to  
the main body, for example similar corner boards, window types, or  
materials. Question the proposed boral panel on the left side elevation and  
how it relates to the main mass.  
c) Suggest reducing the height of the proposed rear dormer to match the  
existing house.  
d) Verify proposed foundation material and if it will match the existing house.  
e) Verify proposed structure is not an ADU.  
f) Verify proposed roofing material to match the existing house.  
Attachments:  
1405 Hines Hill Road  
Addition (Bedrooms, Bathrooms, Laundry Room & 2-Car Garage)  
Submitted by Elizabeth Sweaingen, Peninsula Architects  
a) Section IV-4(c) of the Architectural Design Standards state that all roofs in  
all the wings must be of the same shape as the main body, but they may  
have a different pitch or orientation. Roofs shall not intersect a wall so as  
to cause a valley. Question the shed roof on the proposed addition, as the  
main mass has a gable roof. Additionally, staff notes metal roofing  
materials are proposed while the main mass has a shingled roof.  
b) Staff notes portions of the submitted elevations do not depict lap siding.  
Verify that these areas represent existing lap siding to remain unchanged.  
Attachments:  
1280 Connecticut Woods Drive  
New House (Single-Family Dwelling)  
Submitted by Chris Coblentz  
a) Verify grade line is accurately depicted on submitted elevations.  
b) The Land Development Code states that except for new residential  
development on lots fronting arterial roads, the front setback shall not  
differ by more than ten percent from the average of the front yard setbacks  
existing on the two properties immediately adjoining the subject property,  
unless approved by the Architectural and Historic Board of Review. If one  
or more of the adjoining properties is vacant, the front yard setback shall  
be fifty feet. Staff notes the proposed home would have an approximate 500  
ft setback while the adjacent home has an approximate 200 ft setback;  
however, the AHBR could consider the proposed setback based on the  
shape and size of the lot.  
c) Section IV-(f)(1) of the Architectural Design Standards states that details  
in the main body must be consistently applied throughout all sides of the  
main body. Revise proposed window grid pattern to meet this requirement.  
d) Section IV-(e)(4) of the Architectural Design Standards states that the  
building shall have a typical window used for most windows. Question the  
proposed transom windows on the left side elevation and how they relate  
to the main mass.  
e) Section IV-4 (g)(1) of the Architectural Design Standards states that roofs  
on projections should match the roof material of the building (unless both  
roofs are flat) and to the extent possible, shall be same kind of roof.  
Natural finish metals such as copper, terne coated steel, or lead may be  
substituted for any roofing material. Staff notes that a metal roofing  
material is proposed.  
f) Section III-1(g)(8) of the Architectural Design Standards state that large  
expanses of blank wall are to be avoided. Fenestration placement should  
be at a maximum of approximately every 12 feet. Question if additional  
fenestration is needed on the left side elevation to better meet this  
requirement.  
g) Section III-1 (g) of the Architectural Design Standards requires materials  
to be applied consistently. Revise elevations to depict a consistent  
foundational height/water table around the entire mass.  
h) Submit product spec sheets for all proposed exterior materials.  
Attachments:  
Other Business  
VII.  
263 N Main Street (Historic District) (Informal)  
Alteration (Front Porch Repair)  
Submitted by David Schnear  
a) Appendix 1(6) of the Secretary of Interior Standards state “Deteriorated  
historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity  
of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new  
feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual  
qualities and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features  
shall be substantiated by documentary, physical, or pictorial evidence.”  
Provide additional documentation depicting the existing conditions.  
b) Staff suggests the applicant take this meeting to discuss the proposed  
project with the Board and verify the proposed scope of work.  
c) Staff suggests the Board utilize this meeting for questions for the applicant  
and to set a time for a site visit.  
d) Provide a scaled architectural elevation depicting all proposed changes  
and finish detail for the proposed porch renovation.  
Attachments:  
86 Owen Brown Street (Informal)  
Townhomes  
Submitted by Rhonda Singer, Fairmont Properties  
a) Recommend all townhome buildings along Owen Brown Street be a  
maximum of two stories tall to be more compatible with the existing  
residential homes on the historic street.  
b) Suggest each unit establish a clear architectural style. For example, the  
units in the existing townhome development to the east read clearer as  
Greek Revival, Italianate, etc.  
c) Section IV-11(d)(1) of the Architectural Design Standards state the walls  
of the each dwelling unit must be one material, except that an additional  
material may be used to call attention to the composition. For example a  
second material may be used on building projections, entrance recesses, or  
to emphasize the horizontal or vertical divisions of the building. Staff  
recommends the exterior wall material be applied more traditionally,  
where each building would have one wall material and a masonry  
foundation.  
d) Question the projections that would be visually supported by front porches.  
e) Section IV-11 of the Architectural Design Standards identify townhomes as  
the main body being two stories tall. Staff notes three story units are  
proposed however, the proposed massing and height would align with the  
existing townhome development to the east. If the units along Owen Brown  
Street are reduced to two stories, the massing and height would align with  
the existing single family to the east.  
f) Section IV-11 of the Architectural Design Standards identify townhomes as  
being divided into at least three structural bay, with each bay containing a  
dwelling unit. Staff notes the buildings were intentionally designed with  
reduced bays to better complement Owen Brown Street and reduce overall  
massing.  
g) Section IV-11(4) states the mass may have bay windows or other minor  
projects. For the most part, the building forms a continuous wall on both  
floors. Reduce the size of the projections to meet this requirement.  
h) Section IV-11(g)(1) states Roofs on projections should match the roof  
material of the building, and to the extent possible, shall be the same kind  
of roof. Question the proposed porch roof design in relation to the main  
roofs on the buildings. Suggest more consistency in the porch roof design.  
i) Section IV-11 (e)(4) of the Architectural Design Standards state each  
building shall have a typical window used for most windows. Incorporate  
more consistent window design on the front facades.  
j) Section III-1 (g)(8) of the Architectural Design Standards state that large  
expanses of blank wall are to be avoided. Fenestration placement should  
be at a maximum of approximately every 12 feet. Revise elevations to  
depict additional fenestration detail on the north and east side elevations.  
Attachments:  
Historic Window Proposal - Sierra Pacific Windows  
Westchester Window Series  
Submitted by Dennis Cukon  
a) Staff notes the applicant is requesting that the Sierra Pacific Westchester  
Window Series be considered for inclusion on the AHBR’s list of approved  
window products for the replacement of historic materials within the  
Historic District.  
b) Staff notes the applicant has provided documentation from the National  
Parks Service for the Boards consideration.  
Attachments:  
Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting: July 8,  
2026  
Attachments:  
Staff Update  
VIII.  
IX.  
Adjournment  
*
*
*