City of Hudson, Ohio  
CD Meeting Agenda - Final  
Architectural & Historic Board of Review  
John Caputo, Chair  
Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair  
John Workley, Secretary  
John Funyak  
Françoise Massardier-Kenney  
William Ray  
Karl Wetzel  
Nicholas Sugar, City Planner  
Amanda Krickovich, Associate Planner  
Wednesday, February 14, 2024  
7:30 PM  
Town Hall  
27 East Main Street  
Call To Order  
Roll Call  
I.  
II.  
III.  
Public Comment  
Consent Applications  
IV.  
D.  
5 Atterbury (Everbowl)  
Sign (Wall Sign)  
Submitted by Jeff Clark, Easy Sign Group  
a) Staff recommends approval as submitted.  
Attachments:  
C.  
V.  
95 Bard Drive (Hudson Yard Townhouses)  
Signs (Ground Signs)  
Submitted by Michelle Miller  
a) Staff recommends approval as submitted.  
Attachments:  
Old Business  
A.  
50 Division Street (Historic District)  
Alterations (Door)  
Submitted by James Field  
a) This case went to the AHBR on January 10, 2023. The Board continued the  
project so that the applicant could have more time to explore cost  
estimates for a door material that would be more appropriate for the  
Historic District.  
b) The applicant has submitted additional documentation in response to the  
AHBR request.  
Attachments:  
Legislative History  
1/10/24 Architectural & Historic Board continued  
of Review  
New Business  
VI.  
A.  
51 S. Main Street (Nona’s)  
Sign (Wall Sign)  
Submitted by Jessie Obert, Business Owner  
a) Staff notes the proposal is to install a 30” x 84” building sign for Nona’s  
establishment.  
b) The sign plan for evaporator works requires signs to be constructed of a  
medium density overlay (MDO) material. Staff notes the sign is proposed  
to be an aluminum composite material. Revise sign to depict the required  
MDO material.  
c) Architectural Design Standards state the sign and associated lighting  
fixtures should complement the architecture of the building on which it is  
placed and should be placed in an appropriate location on the building  
facade. Question sign placement on building and if it should be centered  
between the vent and the lower roof.  
d) The Architectural Design Standards state signs should have a matte finish.  
Confirm the sign will comply with this requirement.  
Attachments:  
B.  
85 S. Main Street (Berkshire Hathway)  
Sign (Wall Sign)  
Submitted by Jessie Obert  
a) The sign plan for this establishment is a hunter green sign with off white  
lettering and a boarder. The proposed design will meet this design as well  
as include non-dimensional lettering similar to surrounding signs.  
b) The Architectural Design Standards state signs should have a matte finish.  
Confirm the sign complies with this design standard.  
Attachments:  
E.  
358 Atterbury Blvd  
Addition (704sqft Great Room)  
Submitted by Nate Bailey, Hara Architects  
a) The Architectural Design Standards state additions should be designed to  
be compatible with the main structure by incorporating materials and a  
foundation to match. Staff notes the applicant has confirm the addition will  
have asphalt shingles, horizontal siding to be painted to match the  
existing, and vinyl windows. Confirm how these elements will be  
compatible with the main structure as well as if the foundation will match  
the existing.  
b) The Architectural Design Standards state materials used on an open porch  
or screen room need not be the same as other materials in the structures,  
but should be related to materials used in the details of the structure.  
Confirm how details relate to the existing structure.  
Attachments:  
F.  
259 S. Main Street  
Addition (392sqft Master Suit)  
Submitted by Terry Crites  
a) The Architectural Design Standards state large expanses of blank wall are  
to be avoided. Fenestration placement should be at a maximum of  
approximately every 12 feet. Revise the east elevation to depict  
fenestration.  
b) The Architectural Design Standards state doors and windows on the public  
faces of a building should be arranged so that they are regulated by a  
system of (invisible) parallel and perpendicular lines. Question if the south  
view elevation windows could be revised to be more symmetrical.  
c) The Architectural Design Standards state exposed foundations and tie  
courses shall be of a consistent material on all elevations. Confirm  
proposed exposed foundation will match the existing.  
Attachments:  
G.  
136 Hudson Street (Historic District)  
Addition (1763sqft bedroom, laundry, family room & screen porch)  
Submitted by Fred Margulies, Architect  
a) Staff notes the scope of work includes adding in a front porch roof,  
changing existing two garage doors to one double garage door, window  
removal and replacement on the existing elevation and an addition that  
will include a flat roof.  
b) Staff notes conflicts in roof design, window design, and garage materials  
when reviewing the following Secretary of Interior Preservation Briefs for  
additions to historic buildings:  
-
The new work shall be compatible with the architectural  
features to protect the integrity of the property and its  
environment.  
-
-
-
A new addition must retain the essential form and integrity of  
the historic property.  
The new works should differentiate from the historic mass, bit  
differences should be subtle.  
A new addition should protect those visual qualities that make  
the building eligible for listing on the National Register of  
Historic Places.  
-
-
New work should be harmonious with the old in scale,  
proportions, materials, and color.  
Materials need not be the same as the historic building, but  
they should be harmonious; they should not be so different that  
they stand out or distract from the historic building.  
c) Staff notes the current design proposal would not meet the design  
standards and the Secretary of Interior Standards. Suggest a re-design that  
would be more compatible with these standards.  
Attachments:  
I.  
146 Hudson Street (Historic District)  
Addition (161sqft Sunroom)  
Submitted by Nathanael Dunn, Architect  
a) Applicant is proposing to convert a three seasons room to a conditioned  
sunroom.  
b) Staff notes the home was built in 1991. The Architectural Design  
Standards state because the house is not greater than 50 years old, the  
house would not be contributing to the Historic District and would be  
reviewed according to the type standards rather than the Secretary of  
Interior Standards.  
c) Architectural Design Standards state new freestanding structures and  
non-historic properties: The use of substitute materials is acceptable  
provided they are compatible in proportion, size, style, composition,  
design, color, and texture of historic materials. Staff notes the applicant is  
proposing aluminum clad wood (Pella Lifestyle Series) windows that will  
match the style of the existing windows and the Pella Reserve series for the  
proposed door.  
Attachments:  
Other Business  
VII.  
A.  
Council Annual Check-in - CONTINUED  
Attachments:  
Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting:  
January 24, 2024.  
B.  
Attachments:  
Staff Update  
VIII.  
IX.  
Adjournment  
*
*
*