City of Hudson, Ohio  
CD Meeting Agenda - Final  
Architectural & Historic Board of Review  
John Caputo, Chair  
Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair  
John Workley, Secretary  
Andrew Brown  
Françoise Massardier-Kenney  
Jamie Sredinski  
Nicholas Sugar, City Planner  
Lauren Coffman, Associate Planner  
Wednesday, July 8, 2026  
7:30 PM  
Town Hall  
27 East Main Street  
Call To Order  
Roll Call  
I.  
II.  
III.  
IV.  
V.  
Public Comment  
Consent Applications  
Old Business  
248 N Main Street (Historic District)  
Alteration (Shake Siding Replacement)  
Submitted by Thomas Bellish  
a) Staff notes this application was heard at the June 24, 2026 AHBR meeting.  
b) A site visit took place on June 30, 2026.  
c) The Secretary of Interior Standards state that deteriorated historic features  
shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration  
requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match  
the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where  
possible, materials. Replacement of missing features shall be substantiated  
by documentary, physical, or pictorial evidence. Staff notes Hardi Board is  
proposed as a replacement material for wood siding, as well as Azek trim  
material. Suggest a wood replacement based on the high visibility of the  
house on a corner lot. A wood replacement would also result in consistent  
materials around the 1840 structure.  
d) Provide spec sheet for proposed siding and trim materials.  
Attachments:  
Legislative History  
6/24/26  
Architectural & Historic Board continued  
of Review  
333 Boston Mills Rd (Historic Landmark)  
Accessory Structure (Gazebo Repair)  
Submitted by Kurt Kroger  
a) Staff notes this application was heard at the June 24, 2026 AHBR meeting.  
b) A site visit took place on June 30, 2026.  
c) Staff notes the applicant is proposing to wrap the bottom of the proposed  
4x4 treated wood posts with Azek material. Question the proposed finish  
and how it would relate to the existing historic structure.  
Attachments:  
Legislative History  
6/24/26 Architectural & Historic Board continued  
of Review  
6761 Pheasants Ridge  
Addition (Office, Bathroom, & Recreation Room)  
Submitted by Bridget Tipton, Studio Inlay  
a) Staff notes this application was heard at the June 24, 2026 AHBR meeting.  
b) At the June 24, 2026 AHBR meeting, the Board requested additional  
design options be studied to lessen the overall impact of the proposed  
addition in relation to the primary structure. Staff notes the applicant has  
submitted a revised site plan and elevations accurately depicting the  
existing garage structure.  
c) Section IV-4 (b)(3) of the Architectural Design Standards states that the  
front face of the main body must sit forward at least 18” from the front  
face of the wings. Staff notes the existing wing sits forward of the main  
mass; however, the second story addition would increase the degree of  
nonconformity and would not meet the intent of the requirement for the  
wings to be subordinate to the main mass.  
Attachments:  
Legislative History  
6/24/26 Architectural & Historic Board continued  
of Review  
5248 Preserve Ln  
New House (Single-Family Dwelling)  
Submitted by Tony Lunardi, LDA Builders  
a) Staff notes this application was heard at the June 24, 2026 AHBR meeting.  
b) Staff notes the applicant has submitted revised elevations for the Boards  
consideration depicting a revised front elevation and roofline.  
c) Revise submitted site plan to depict proposed impervious surface  
calculations.  
d) Section IV-4(c) of the Architectural Design Standards state that all roofs in  
all the wings must be of the same shape as the main body, but they may  
have a different pitch or orientation. Roofs shall not intersect a wall so as  
to cause a valley. Question the proposed rear gable roofs, as the main  
mass has a hip roof.  
e) Section IV-4 of the Architectural Design Standards state that large  
expanses of blank wall are to be avoided. Fenestration placement should  
be at a maximum of approximately every 12 feet. Suggest revising the rear  
elevation to incorporate additional architectural detail to be applied in the  
proposed rear gables to better meet this requirement.  
Attachments:  
Legislative History  
6/24/26 Architectural & Historic Board continued  
of Review  
New Business  
VI.  
5840 Darrow Rd  
Sign (Wall Sign)  
Submitted by Melissa Frontino  
a) Section V-5 (c)(1) of the Architectural Design Standards states that signs  
should be fabricated on and of materials that are of permanent quality,  
good durability, and are complementary to the building of which they  
become a part. Question if the proposed aluminum composite wall sign  
material is compatible with surrounding signs.  
b) Suggest raised letters to complement the existing signs.  
Attachments:  
6754 Stow Rd  
Fence (4ft Vinyl Fence)  
Submitted by Madison Cope  
a) Section III-1 (f)(3) of the Architectural Design Standards states that fence  
heights and materials shall be compatible with their site location and  
surrounding development. Fences in the front yard shall be more formal in  
design and lower in height when sited close to the street or sidewalk. Staff  
notes the rail fence is proposed along the front property line, however, the  
property is approximately 4 acres and would be similar in design to the  
neighboring fence.  
Attachments:  
15 Baldwin Street (Historic District)  
Alterations (Door Replacement)  
Submitted by Abigail Lilli, Gunton Corp  
a) Appendix 1 - (6) of the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for  
Rehabilitation states that deteriorated historic features shall be repaired  
rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires  
replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in  
design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible,  
materials. Replacement of missing features shall be substantiated by  
documentary, physical, or pictorial evidence.  
b) Verify existing door material.  
c) Verify like for like replacement.  
Attachments:  
3133 Middleton Road  
Accessory Structures (Detached Garage)  
Submitted by Mike Miller  
a) Section III-1 (d)(5) of the Architectural Design Standards state that all  
facades (including the rear) over twelve (12) feet long shall have at least  
one window or door opening. Fenestration placement on the accessory  
structure shall be proportional to the house. Suggest additional  
fenestration on rear elevation to better meet this requirement.  
b) Section III-1 (d)(2) of the Architectural Design Standards state that  
enclosed accessory buildings shall incorporate some elements similar to  
the main body, for example similar corner boards, window types, or  
materials. Question the proposed slider windows and how they relate to  
the existing house.  
c) Section III-1 (d)(1) of the Architectural Design Standards states that no  
accessory building may be taller than the main body of the building. Verify  
the proposed garage will not be taller than the existing house.  
d) Verify proposed foundation material and if it would match the existing  
house.  
e) Verify proposed size of treated wood posts and if they would be wrapped in  
additional material.  
f) Verify proposed shingles would match the existing house.  
Attachments:  
2933 Hudson Aurora Road  
Accessory Structures (Detached Garage)  
Submitted by Temurjon Akhadov, Platinum Construction DBA  
a) Section III-1 (d)(2) of the Architectural Design Standards state that  
enclosed accessory buildings shall incorporate some elements similar to  
the main body, for example similar corner boards, window types, or  
materials. Question the proposed window type, metal awning and how they  
relate to the main house.  
b) Section III-1 (d)(5) of the Architectural Design Standards state that all  
facades (including the rear) over twelve (12) feet long shall have at least  
one window or door opening. Fenestration placement on the accessory  
structure shall be proportional to the house. Suggest additional  
fenestration on the left, right and rear elevations to better meet this  
requirement.  
c) Section III-1 (d)(1) of the Architectural Design Standards states that no  
accessory building may be taller than the main body of the building. Verify  
the proposed garage will not be taller than the existing house.  
d) Verify proposed foundation material and if it would match the existing  
house.  
Attachments:  
7400 Valerie Ln  
Addition (Sunroom)  
Submitted by John Caputo  
a) Section IV-4 (h)(3) of the Architectural Design Standards states that  
additions should be designed to be compatible with the main structure by  
incorporating materials and a foundation to match. Question if proposed  
foundation material will match the existing house.  
Attachments:  
Other Business  
VII.  
Architectural and Historic Board of Review Findings of Fact for case #26-644  
for the property located at 179 Elm Street, Hudson, OH 44236  
Attachments:  
Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting: June  
24, 2026  
Attachments:  
Staff Update  
VIII.  
IX.  
Adjournment  
*
*
*