City of Hudson, Ohio  
CD Meeting Agenda - Final  
Architectural & Historic Board of Review  
John Caputo, Chair  
Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair  
John Workley, Secretary  
Andrew Brown  
Amy Manko  
Françoise Massardier-Kenney  
Jamie Sredinski  
Nicholas Sugar, City Planner  
Lauren Coffman, Associate Planner  
Wednesday, October 8, 2025  
7:30 PM  
Town Hall  
27 East Main Street  
Call To Order  
Roll Call  
I.  
II.  
III.  
IV.  
Public Comment  
Consent Applications  
5806 Timberline Trail  
Addition (Covered Deck)  
Submitted by Vlatko Demrovski  
a) Staff recommends approval as submitted.  
Attachments:  
64 Aurora Street (Historic District)  
Fence (3.5 Ft Aluminum)  
Submitted by Nate Ploskonka  
a) Staff recommends approval as submitted.  
Attachments:  
1751 Barlow Rd  
Addition (Bedroom & Bathroom)  
Submitted by Bill Young, Legacy Remodeling  
a) Staff recommends approval as submitted.  
Attachments:  
2732 Middleton Rd  
Addition (Laundry Room and Mud Room)  
Submitted by Nate Bailey, Hara Architects  
a) Staff recommends approval as submitted.  
Attachments:  
Old Business  
V.  
358 Oldham Way  
Addition (3 Seasons Room)  
Submitted by Dylan Hart, Portage Timberworks  
a) Staff notes that this application was tabled at the September 24, 2025,  
AHBR meeting.  
b) The applicant has submitted revised elevations for the Board’s  
consideration.  
Attachments:  
78 Aurora Street (Historic District)  
Addition (Kitchen, Laundry Room, Elevator & Garage)  
Submitted by Rebecca Pantuso, Pantuso Architecture  
a) Revise submitted survey to depict proposed grading changes and  
impervious surface calculations.  
b) The applicant received approval for the proposed addition at the May 28,  
2025 meeting.  
c) The applicant is proposing a revised design that includes the demolition of  
the existing garage and revised overall massing.  
d) Staff consulted the Secretary of Interior Standards of Rehabilitation,  
Preservation Brief #14, and the previous consultant review to provide  
these comments.  
e) Staff notes the applicant has removed the previously proposed pyramid  
roof form that was deemed inappropriate by the city’s consultant.  
f) Staff notes the redesign creates a better visual distinction between the  
addition and historic mass by further lowering the roof height of the  
addition.  
g) Question the removal/rebuild of the existing garage. The Secretary of  
Interior Standards for Rehabilitation state that the historic character of a  
property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic  
materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property  
shall be avoided.  
h) If rebuilding the garage is considered, suggest tile roofing to match the  
house as the garage would now be an attached mass.  
i) Suggest utilizing a different wall material such as a wood panel for the  
garage connector on the left elevation.  
j) Suggest wood siding in lieu of the proposal boral siding as a portion of the  
addition would replace the existing addition that wraps around the historic  
main mass on the left side elevation.  
k) Staff notes sidelites are proposed to be introduced to the front door. The  
existing door trim design should be retained on the historic main mass.  
l) Submit product specification sheets for the proposed garage doors.  
m) Question the proposed window design for the garage and their  
compatibility to the main house. Staff notes recessed panels are proposed;  
however, should be revised to window openings as Section III-1(g)(8)  
states fenestration placement should be at a maximum of approximately  
every 12 feet.  
n) The AHBR may wish to request assistance from the city’s consultant in  
determining the appropriateness of the proposed work.  
Attachments:  
New Business  
VI.  
6420 Lost Woods Ln  
Addition (Bedroom & Bathroom)  
Submitted by Quinn Miller, Peninsula Architects  
a) Section IV-4(b)(2) of the Architectural Design Standards state “The front  
face of the main body must sit forward at least 18" from the front face of  
the wings.” Additionally, Section IV4(h)(1) states “The wing must be  
attached at the rear or side of the building and may not extend forward of  
the main body” Staff notes the proposed addition would extend in front of  
the main body approximately 6 ft. Revise the projection to meet this  
requirement.  
b) Section IV-4(g)(4) of the Architectural Design Standards state projections  
on the ground floor should be carried through the foundation. Revise the  
front and rear bay window projections to depict a full foundation  
underneath.  
c) Section IV-(f)(2) of the Architectural Design Standards states that details  
in a wing must be consistently applied throughout the sides of that wing.  
Revise elevations to depict shutters consistently applied around the  
proposed wing addition.  
d) Submit spec sheets of all proposed exterior materials.  
Attachments:  
5235 Preserve Ln  
New House (Single Family Dwelling)  
Submitted by LDA Builders, Inc. Lunardi  
a) Verify grade line is accurately depicted on the submitted elevations.  
b) Revise site plan to depict impervious surface calculations.  
c) Section IV-4(d)(1) of the Architectural Design Standards state that the  
walls of the main body must be a dominant material. Up to two additional  
materials may be used to call attention to the composition. Staff notes that  
brick, horizontal and vertical siding are proposed. Revise elevations to  
remove a material type and depict more consistent materials around the  
main mass.  
d) Submit a roof plan.  
e) Question proposed siding material depicted on the front elevation between  
the 1st and 2nd story windows.  
f) Section IV-3(e)(4) of the Architectural Design Standards states “the  
building shall have a typical window used for most windows.” Revise the  
window design to depict a more consistent typical window.  
g) Revise front elevation to depict consistent window trim around the 2nd  
story bedroom window, bedroom #4.  
h) Revise elevation to accurately depict the proposed trim around the entry  
door on the clipped roof and left side elevation.  
i) Question the height of the proposed gable on the front elevation. Staff  
notes that roofs on projections must be subordinate and, at minimum, level  
with the main mass. Revise elevations to meet this requirement.  
j) Section IV-4(f) of the Architectural Design Standards state that details in  
the main body must be consistently applied throughout all sides of the  
main body. Staff notes awnings are only applied to the front elevation.  
k) Submit spec sheets for all exterior materials.  
Attachments:  
130 Aurora Street (Historic District)  
Accessory Structure (Detached Garage)  
Submitted by Kody Kocias, Peninsula Architects  
a) Section III-1(d)(5) of the Architectural Design Standards states “All  
facades (including the rear) over twelve (12) feet long shall have at least  
one window or door opening. Fenestration placement on the accessory  
structure shall be proportional to the house.” Suggest additional  
fenestration on the rear, south and north side elevations to meet this  
requirement.  
b) Question period of significance for existing garage to be demolished.  
Suggest site visit to determine whether the garage is contributing to the  
Historic District. Submit detailed photographs of each side of the garage  
for evaluation.  
c) Revise north side elevation to accurately depict proposed roofline.  
d) Question the appropriateness of proposed fiberglass & steel entry door.  
e) Submit a roof plan  
f) Section III-1(d)(2) of the Architectural Design Standards states “Enclosed  
accessory buildings shall incorporate some elements similar to the main  
body, for example similar corner boards, window types, or materials”.  
Question the proposed metal awning roof on the south elevation.  
Additionally, staff notes that 3-tab roofing shingles are proposed. Question  
how proposed material relates to the existing house.  
Attachments:  
191 Elm Street (Historic District)  
Alteration (Door Replacement)  
Submitted by Ashley Ressler  
a) Question the appropriateness of the proposed door material. Staff notes a  
fiberglass door is proposed. Fiberglass doors have not been an approved  
material within the historic district.  
Attachments:  
670 Terex Rd  
Addition (Living Room, Kitchen & Garage)  
Submitted by Andrew Heilmeier  
a) Section IV-3(1) of the Architectural Design Standards state that wings may  
not be larger or taller than the main body of the structure. Staff notes the  
proposal would add a second story addition to the wing and would be taller  
than the main body. Staff recommends this significant conflict with the code be  
addressed prior to the addition review comments being given.  
Attachments:  
Other Business  
Staff Update  
Adjournment  
VII.  
VIII.  
IX.  
*
*
*