a roof plan has been submitted, discussed removing a siding material around the front door,
noted the elevations have been revised so that the upper gable is not above the roof line,
described the trim around the side door and the windows as all being 4-inch trim, noted the
front door is inset by 28-inches, and that awnings around the front have been allowed
previously.
The applicant distributed revised plans to the Board and staff.
The Board, applicant, and staff discussed: The siding materials and window colors and
orientation, that the siding between the windows is the owner's preference and that it
introduced a new material because of the orientation, the materials, their orientation around
the front door and that they terminate on inside corners, the possibility of using more brick
around the front door, that the front windows are placed to be in alignment, that the awnings
have metal roofs-which the Board has generally approved as an accent material, that the side
elevation transom windows are in the great room to allow for built-ins below, the possibility
of eliminating the material around the front door and using board and batten siding, that slider
windows are used around the dining area, the various roof pitches and types used on the
structure, the vertical siding on the front and garage side not blending in with the horizontal
siding, that all the brick on the house will be the same color, that three separate materials are
proposed on the front of the main mass, that the Board feels the awning in the front will be
approved, that the typical window is a double-hung - however there are a number of fixed and
slider windows, and that the narrow windows on the right side elevation are problematic.
Chair Caputo recommended that the elevations be revised and resubmitted with the possibility
of preferred and alternative plans.
A motion was made by Ms. Marzulla, seconded by Mr. Workley, that this AHBR
Application be continued to allow for revised plans to be submitted. The motion carried
by the following vote:
Aye:
5 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms. Manko
2 - Ms. Kenney and Mr. Brown
Absent:
130 Aurora Street (Historic District)
Accessory Structure (Detached Garage)
Attachments:
Ms. Coffman introduced the application by displaying the site plans, and reviewing the staff
comments.
Mr. Joe Matava, and Mr. Kody Kocias, Peninsula Architects, stated the date of build for the
garage to be demolished is unknown, the details of the garage have no distinctive features, it
is a typical wood frame, and is in poor condition. Staff noted the only known fact is that the
garage is present in photos from 1970.
The Board, applicant, and staff, discussed: The lack of fenestration - the applicant belief that
additional fenestration, will detract from the proposed design, the possibility of moving the
windows closer together to resolve the fenestration problem, that a steel or fiberglass entry
door is not allowed in the Historic District, design elements on the proposed garage are
needed that relate to the house, the need for a site visit, that the proposed garage area be
staked prior to a site visit, and that the windows on the proposed garage be made more
vertical as the small house windows are.
A motion was made by Ms. Manko, seconded by Mr. Workley, that this AHBR
Application be continued. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye:
5 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms. Manko
2 - Ms. Kenney and Mr. Brown
Absent:
