City of Hudson, Ohio

CD Meeting Agenda - Final

Architectural & Historic Board of Review

John Caputo, Chair

Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair

John Workley, Secretary

Amy Manko

Françoise Massardier-Kenney

William Ray

Jamie Sredinski

Nicholas Sugar, City Planner

Amanda Krickovich, Associate Planner

Wednesday, June 11, 2025

7:30 PM

Town Hall

27 East Main Street

Call To Order

Roll Call

II.

III.

Public Comment

Consent Applications

IV.

AHBR 25-636

136 Elm St. (Historic District)

Alterations - Shingle replacement and deck stair rebuild

Submitted by Larkin Rogers

a) Staff recommends approval as submitted.

Attachments:

136 Elm Street Packet for AHBR

AHBR

1727 Mayflower Ln.

2024-135

Addition

Submitted by Jeff Raggets

a) Staff recommends approval as submitted.

Attachments:

1727 Mayflower Packet for AHBR

Old Business

AHBR 25-417

7 College Street (Historic District)

Fence (6 foot privacy)

Submitted by Northeast Ohio Fence (Heather Borowy)

a) Staff notes that this application was tabled at the May 14, 2025 meeting.

b) Verify the proposed fence would be located behind the main mass of the

house.

c) Question if the proposed fence would abut any existing fences.

Attachments:

7 College Street Packet for AHBR

7 College Street - AHBR Packet 5.28.25

AHBR 25-493

80 N Oviatt St (Historic District)

Fence (6 ft Privacy)

Submitted by Northeast Ohio Fence

a) Section III-1(f)(3) states “fence heights and materials shall be compatible

with their site location and development”. Staff notes the proposed fence

would tie into and extend a neighboring fence. Submit addition photos of

the area of the proposed fence and the existing neighboring fence to verify

an appropriate design and transition.

Attachments:

80 N Oviatt St - AHBR Packet

New Business

VI.

AHBR 25-616

272 N Main St. (Historic District)

Shingle Replacement

Submitted by Michael Patterson, Patterson Roofing Company

a) Verify the existing roof material and if there are any differences in

material, for example, flat epdm to shingle.

b) Verify scope of work and which exact areas are being re-roofed.

c) Provide photos of existing house and roof (4 sides)

Attachments:

272 N Main St. Packet For AHBR

AHBR 25-564

21 Baldwin St. (Historic District)

Alteration - Window Replacement

Submitted by Evie Monk, Universal Windows Direct

a) Staff notes vinyl windows are proposed. Revise proposed windows to

wood or wood clad simulated divided lite to be appropriate with the historic

district.

Attachments:

21 Baldwin St Packet for AHBR

AHBR 25-526

60 E Case Dr.

Alteration (Siding replacement)

Submitted by Julie Albrecht

a) Staff notes the work commenced without permit and a stop work order was

issued.

b) Section IV-4(d)(3) states “The materials used in any mass must be applied

consistently on that mass on all sides of the structure.” Staff notes the

proposed stone would not be applied consistently; however, staff notes a

disproportionally large number of homes in the neighborhood with this

design. Staff recommends approval of the proposal, though limiting the

stone to end at the inside corner of the garage and porch and not applied

to the separate garage mass.

Attachments:

60 E Case Packet for AHBR

AHBR 25-551

65 Owen Brown St.

Accessory Structure

Submitted by James Hopkins

a) Submit additional photos of the existing house and garage (all four sides of

each structure).

b) The Land Development Code requires a 5 ft separation between accessory

structures. Revise the site plan to verify a minimum 5 ft separation

between the proposed structure and the existing garage.

c) Section III-1(d)(1) states “No accessory building may be larger in ground

floor footprint or taller than the main body of the building, except for

agricultural uses. Verify the proposed structure would not be taller than

the house.

d) Section III-1(d)(2) states “Enclosed accessory buildings shall incorporate

some elements similar to the main body, for example similar corner

boards, window types, or materials.” Suggest the design incorporate

gable returns, window design, and trim thickness to match the main house.

e) Question the proposed siding material as compatible to the main house.

f) Verify the proposed porch roof material.

g) Section III-1(d)(5) states “Fenestration placement on the accessory

structure shall be proportional to the house.” Staff notes the multi-story

building should have consistent fenestration on each level.

Attachments:

65 Owen Brown St - AHBR Packet

AHBR 25-604

5839 Williamsburg Cir

Addition

Submitted by Tyler Rickenbacher, Hartman Carpentry and Construction

a) Submit photos of the four sides of the house

b) Revise elevations to label exterior materials. Question the proposed

foundation material.

c) Section II-1(g)(3) states “Exposed foundations and tie courses shall be of a

consistent material on all elevations.” Question the multiple foundation

materials proposed.

d) Section II-1(g)(8) states “Large expanses of blank wall are to be avoided.

Fenestration placement should be at a maximum of approximately every 12

feet.” Staff notes a span of 14 ft on the left elevation without fenestration.

Add additional fenestration to meet this requirement.

e) Question if additional pavement is proposed to serve the rear garage.

f) Section III-2(g)(11) states “Replacement wall and roof materials should be

blended across a facade (rather than small patch areas) to ensure

compatibility with existing materials.” Question how siding would be

blended to meet this requirement. Suggesting stepping the addition to

allow for a clear break point with cornerboard.

Attachments:

5839 Williamsburg Cir Packet for AHBR

AHBR 25-482

13 N. Oviatt St

New Construction (Single-family dwelling)

Submitted by Nate Bailey, Hara Architects

a) Staff notes the proposal would include demolition of the existing home.

The AHBR reviewed prior and determined the demolition would be

approved upon an appropriate new house design .

b) The Land Development Code states “averaging shall be required for

setbacks: Except for new residential development on lots fronting arterial

roads, the front setback shall not differ by more than ten percent from the

average of the front yard setbacks existing on the two properties

immediately adjoining the subject property, unless approved by the

Architectural and Historic Board of Review. If one or more of the

adjoining properties is vacant, the front yard setback shall be fifty feet.”

Staff notes the home is proposed with an 18 ft 4 in setback, which is within

10% of the 19 ft average of the immediately adjoining properties. The

applicant will revise the civil site plan to reflect the setback.

c) Question the inset entryway and if it is typical of this style of house.

d) Question if the grade line is accurately depicted and if the exposed

foundation would be applied consistently.

e) Add shutters to the rear windows so that they are applied consistently

around the house.

f) Question the proposed shutter material.

g) Question the proposed roof material of the front porch.

h) Question if a new wood fence is proposed or if the existing is depicted on

the site plan.

i) Revise the engineered site plan to include an impervious surface

calculation.

j) Revise notes on elevations to verify specific materials proposed. Remove

references to alternates.

k) Staff notes typical siding reveal in the surrounding neighborhood is 4”-6”.

Question if the proposed 8” reveal is appropriate.

Attachments:

13 N Oviatt Packet for AHBR

AHBR 25-409

5247 Preserve Ln.

New Residential Development (Single-family dwelling)

Submitted by Tony Lunardi, LDA Builders Inc.

a) Section IV-3(b)(2) states “The front face of the main body must sit forward

at least 18" from the front face of the wings.” Projections may extend

forward of the main mass, otherwise they are treated as wings. Staff notes

a front wing extension of approximately 8 ft. Revise to 5 ft to be treated as

a projection.

b) Section 1205.04(D)(7) of the Land Development Code’s Orientation

Standards states “The front wall of the principal structure shall be parallel

to the street or perpendicular to a radius of the curve of the street extended

through the approximate center of the main mass, if the street is curved”.

Revise orientation to be perpendicular to the radius of the curve.

c) Question the look alike standards in relation to sublot #3. Section III-1(b)

states “Buildings which are the same type must differ from one another in

two of the following: A. wall material, B. architectural style, C. major

features such as porches or turrets, D. organization and number of bays,

E. wing configuration, or F. roof shape. These terms are defined in

Appendix II.”

Attachments:

5247 Preserve Lane PAcket for AHBR

AHBR 25-567

5260 Preserve Ln.

New Residential Development, (Single-family dwelling)

Submitted by Tony Lunardi, LDA Builders Inc.

a) Revise site plan to indicate limits of disturbance to align with previously

approved variance.

b) Revise first floor window design at front porch so as not to be depicted to

extend into exposed foundation.

c) Question hip roof extension of front porch. Suggest aligning porch with

second story cornerboard.

d) Reduce the front office/den extension by 10” to be considered a projection

and; therefore, permitted to be extended forward of the main mass.

e) Question the roof overlap on the left side elevation and the massing

overlap on the right elevation.

Attachments:

5260 Preserve Lane Packet for AHBR

Other Business

VII.

Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting: May

28, 2025.

AHBR

5.28.2025

Attachments:

May 28, 2025 - AHBR Meeting Minutes DRAFT

Staff Update

VIII.

IX.

Adjournment