City of Hudson, Ohio  
CD Meeting Agenda - Final  
Architectural & Historic Board of Review  
John Caputo, Chair  
Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair  
John Workley, Secretary  
Amy Manko  
Françoise Massardier-Kenney  
Jamie Sredinski  
Nicholas Sugar, City Planner  
Lauren Coffman, Associate Planner  
Wednesday, August 13, 2025  
7:30 PM  
Town Hall  
27 East Main Street  
Call To Order  
Roll Call  
I.  
II.  
III.  
IV.  
Public Comment  
Consent Applications  
5641 Abbyshire Dr  
Addition (Roof over patio)  
Submitted by Jennifer Young  
a) Staff recommends approval as submitted.  
Attachments:  
134 N Main St (Historic District)  
Sign (Projecting, Rear entrance)  
Submitted by Kathy Johnson  
a) Staff recommends approval as submitted.  
Attachments:  
Old Business  
V.  
44 Owen Brown St (Historic District)  
Accessory Structure (Detached Garage)  
Submitted by Trevor Stewart  
a) Staff notes that this application was tabled at the May 14, 2025, AHBR  
Meeting.  
b) The following item from the Secretary of the Interior Standards for  
rehabilitation is relevant as the proposed addition significantly impacts the  
existing accessory building. Additionally, the large addition should be  
studied in relation the historic house: “New additions, exterior alterations,  
or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that  
characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the  
old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural  
features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its  
environment”.  
c) Question the proposed addition having a height greater than the existing  
garage structure as the proposal should be compatible and subordinate to  
the exiting accessory structure and main house.  
d) The proposed story and a half walls appear out of proportion with the  
surrounding development. Suggest lowering the ridge and side walls by  
several feet and incorporating a large dormer if second level space is  
needed.  
e) Section III-1(d) of the Architectural Design Standards state that  
fenestration placement on accessory structures shall be proportional to the  
house. Revise rear elevation to depict additional first story fenestration.  
Attachments:  
Legislative History  
5/14/25 Architectural & Historic Board continued  
of Review  
New Business  
VI.  
1532 Callander Dr  
Alteration (Shutters)  
Submitted by Mark Miller  
a) Staff notes this application was approved at the July 26, 2025 AHBR  
Meeting.  
b) The applicant is requesting to remove the proposed shutters on the West  
elevation. Section IV-(f)(2) of the Architectural Design Standards state that  
details in a wing must be consistently applied throughout the sides of that  
wing. Staff notes that 2 sides of the existing house currently do not have  
shutters, and the proposed design would be consistent with the  
surrounding neighborhood.  
Attachments:  
2690 Middleton Rd  
Alteration (Siding Replacement)  
Submitted by Jeshua Arlia  
a) Section IV - (1)(d)(2) of the Architectural Design Standards state the  
materials used in the main body must be applied consistently on that mass  
on all sides of the structure. Staff notes the applicant is proposing to  
replace siding on the rear of the home in a different color than the existing  
home. Staff notes the existing siding is discontinued.  
b) Section V-5 of the Architectural Design Standards defines wall materials  
and states that the walls of a building are all the solid surfaces which are  
perpendicular to the ground, including areas in roof peaks, but not  
including expressed structural columns, window and door surrounds,  
decorative rough timbers, cornice boards, and other details. (28)  
Materials which are the same but are a different color or texture shall not  
be considered different materials for the purposes of these Design  
Standards.  
Attachments:  
21 Baldwin St (Historic District)  
Alteration (Front Door and Window Replacement)  
Submitted by Julie Pratt  
a) Staff notes the AHBR has not previously reviewed the proposed window  
type. Submit a sample of the proposed window for the Board to review.  
b) Suggest incorporation of an additional row of window divides for the front  
door proposal to be more appropriate for the historic district.  
c) Verify aluminum clad windows are being proposed.  
d) Verify simulated divided light muntins are being proposed.  
e) The Secretary of Interior Standards state “Distinctive features, finishes,  
and construction techniques or examples of craftmanship that characterize  
a property shall be preserved”. Question the removal of the transom  
window above the door and if a wood panel replacement would be more  
appropriate.  
Attachments:  
90 Aurora St (Historic District)  
Addition, Alteration (3 Seasons Room & Windows)  
Submitted by Eric Kuczek  
a) Submit product spec sheets for all proposed external materials, windows  
and proposed door.  
b) Section IV-4 of the Architectural Design Standards state that Additions  
should be designed to be compatible with the main structure by  
incorporating materials and a foundation to match. Staff notes that the left  
elevation would need a full foundation, as it would be visible. Revise  
elevations to depict foundation to match existing home.  
c) Question if the vertical siding within the left gable is existing or  
replacement.  
Attachments:  
5457 Stow Rd  
Addition (3 Seasons Room)  
Submitted by Bill Mavrakis  
a) Revise front elevation to accurately depict the front steps  
b) Section IV-4 of the Architectural Design Standards state all roofs in all the  
wings must be of the same shape as the main body, but they may have a  
different pitch or orientation. Roofs shall not intersect a wall so as to  
cause a valley. Staff notes the existing house has a gable and mansard roof  
structure. Suggest revising the proposed elevations to depict a gable roofs  
to better align with the existing roof shape.  
c) Section IV-4 of the Architectural Design Standards state that Additions  
should be designed to be compatible with the main structure by  
incorporating materials and a foundation to match. Revise elevations to  
depict foundation to match existing home.  
d) Provide deck detail noted on the submitted drawings as page 6.  
e) Submit spec sheets of all proposed materials.  
Attachments:  
750 W Streetsboro St  
Commercial Addition (Office)  
Submitted by Eric Dalpiaz, Sol Harris/Day Architecture  
a) Submit material specification sheets for exterior brick, metal panels,  
shingles, and windows.  
b) Section IV-5(d)(2) of the Architectural Design Standards state “The  
materials used in any mass must be consistently applied on that mass on  
all side of the building.” Revise the exterior material to brick where it  
transitions to metal panels on the same wall plane.  
c) Section IV-5(h)(3) state “Additions should be designed to be compatible  
with the main structure”. Suggest the addition incorporate lintels above  
the windows and a soldier course brick pattern to match the existing  
building.  
d) Section IV-5(b)(2) of the Architectural Design Standards state “wings  
shall be the same size or smaller in height than the central masses”. Verify  
how the height of the proposed mass relates to the existing masses.  
Attachments:  
430 Barlow Rd  
Single-Family Dwelling (New House)  
Submitted by Brian Kuntz, Sonoma Homes  
a) Verify the stone applied to the front porch would terminate at the inside  
corner.  
b) Verify the grade is accurately depicted on the elevations.  
c) Verify the proposed stone material on the foundation and the chimney  
would match.  
d) Section IV-3(g)(2) of the Architectural Design Standards state  
“Projections which extend out from the mass to which they are attached  
more than five feet will be treated as wings”. Section IV-3(2) states “The  
front face of the main body must sit forward at least 18" from the front face  
of the wings”. Therefore, there may only be a 5 ft projection forward of  
the main mass. Staff notes the wings for Bedroom #4 and the Master  
Bedroom would extend approximately 8 feet from the main mass. Revise  
the design so there is a maximum 5 foot extension.  
Attachments:  
Other Business  
VII.  
Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting: July 9,  
2025  
Attachments:  
Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting: July  
23, 2025  
Attachments:  
Staff Update  
VIII.  
IX.  
Adjournment  
*
*
*