The applicant has submitted revised elevations for the Board to review.
Attachments:
Ms. Coffman introduced the application by displaying the elevations, describing the project,
and reviewing the staff comments.
Mr. Bill Mavrakis, applicant, described the front steps and was informed that the drawings
will need to be revised to show the details of the steps. Mr. Mavrakis also noted: The hip roof
was designed to accommodate the height of the windows which are not included on the
drawings because he plans to reuse the existing windows. The Board and Mr. Mavrakis also
discussed the need for a matching foundation on the proposed four-season room.
The Board, applicant, and staff, discussed: That when the entire house is resided, the siding
will go down to the grade, the location of the sunroom, and replacing the hip roofs with shed
roofs..
A motion was made by Mr. Workley, seconded by Ms. Kenney, that this AHBR
Application be continued. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye:
5 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Workley and Ms. Sredinski
Commercial Addition (Office)
Attachments:
Mr. Sugar introduced the application for a 7500 square foot addition, displaced the site plan,
renderings, and reviewed the staff comments.
Mr. Eric Dalpiaz, Sol Harris/Day Architecture, distributed information regarding the staff
comments, described the project and materials, the effort to match existing materials and the
height of the pitched roof. Mr. Dalpiaz then walked through the staff comments, including: the
exact match of the brick, the white window frames, that the shingles will be a close match
with efforts underway to get the exact match, and that the windows will be matched including
the black frames. Mr. Dalpiaz noted the overhang will have white panels, with 2-inch trim at
each corner. The Board noted that an interior courtyard is being created and that the
consistent use of brick around the building is favored.
Regarding staff comment "b", the reason for using metal is that the wall cannot be seen unless
walking between the buildings, which should not take place, this is a cost savings measure.
The brick termination will be around a corner, to give a pilaster effect, and that no windows
look into the courtyard area. Regarding staff comment "c", and the header above the windows,
the applicant described the attempt to mimic the current panelized look of the gymnasium,and
that the use of soldier brick courses will assist in a consistent facade, Regarding staff
comment "d", the applicant reviewed the heights around the building and noted the proposed
roof is lower than the sanctuary roof. The Board and applicant discussed the number of
downspouts and windows on the end elevation.
The Board and applicant discussed the use of black fencing on the first and second levels.
A motion was made by Mr. Workley, seconded by Ms. Kenney, that this AHBR
Application be approved as amended with: 1) Removing the metal in the inner
courtyard area and replacing it with brick. 2) The soldier course on the windows be
either stone or a color that gives the appearance of brick - to be coordinated with staff.
3) And that the final fence style and color be coordinated with staff. The motion carried
by the following vote:
Aye:
5 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Workley and Ms. Sredinski