City of Hudson, Ohio  
CD Meeting Agenda - Final  
Architectural & Historic Board of Review  
John Caputo, Chair  
Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair  
John Workley, Secretary  
John Funyak  
Françoise Massardier-Kenney  
William Ray  
Karl Wetzel  
Nicholas Sugar, City Planner  
Amanda Krickovich, Associate Planner  
Wednesday, November 8, 2023  
7:30 PM  
Town Hall  
27 East Main Street  
Call To Order  
Roll Call  
I.  
II.  
III.  
Public Comment  
Consent Applications  
IV.  
A.  
85 South Main Street  
Sign (Awaken Bake)  
Submitted by Brian Becker  
a) Staff recommends approval as submitted.  
Attachments:  
Old Business  
V.  
B.  
29 Division Street (Historic District)  
Alterations (Windows)  
Submitted by Jared Crowe  
a) This case went to the AHBR on October 25, 2023. The Board requested the  
applicant explore a window material that would be more compatible  
within the Historic District.  
b) The Applicant has submitted the Marvin Ultimate Series which is typically  
an approved window material in the Historic District.  
Attachments:  
Legislative History  
10/25/23 Architectural & Historic Board continued  
of Review  
New Business  
VI.  
A.  
200 N Main Street (Historic District)  
Sign (Revival)  
Submitted by Audrey Allshouse  
a) The applicant is proposing a building sign and projecting sign to replace  
the existing Peachtree signage.  
b) The Land Development Code states projecting signs can not exceed 6  
square feet. The applicant is proposing a projecting sign that is 6.9 square  
feet. Reduce the sign size to meet this requirement.  
c) Staff suggests a dimensional sign with raised letters to be more compatible  
with surrounding signage.  
d) The applicant is proposing a vinyl overlay. Question the use of the vinyl  
and its compatibility in the Historic District.  
e) Submit and elevation of how the proposed sign will look on the building.  
Attachments:  
B.  
150 N. Main (Historic District)  
Sign (Favorite Sister)  
Submitted by Emily Westlake  
a) The applicant is proposing a 4 square foot projecting hanging sign and  
two vinyl window signs on the building.  
b) Staff notes vinyl windows signs are allowable up to 33% window coverage.  
The applicant is in compliance with this regulation.  
c) The applicant is proposing an aluminum sign with vinyl graphics.  
Question the use of the vinyl and its compatibility in the Historic District.  
d) Staff notes the overall modern design in comparison to the more  
traditional hanging signs on North Main Street made out of routed HDU.  
e) The Architectural Design Standards state signs must have a matte finish.  
Verify the sign will have a matte finish.  
Attachments:  
C.  
37 E. Main Street (Historic District)  
Alteration & Addition (Windows, Doors, & Porch & Dormer Addition)  
Submitted by Bridget Tipton  
a) Staff notes the scope of work includes a front porch addition to match the  
porch in the 1937 renovation, enclose the back porch to convert it to a four  
seasons room, add transom windows in the great room and enclosed  
porch, remove the bay window that was added in the 1960’s, remove two  
exterior doors and replace them with windows to match existing, and add a  
dormer on the south elevation.  
b) The Architectural Design Standards state exposed foundation and tie  
courses shall be of a consistent material. Question if there will be exposed  
foundation on the 4 seasons room and if it will match the existing.  
c) Staff notes existing details such as frieze boards and trim boards are not  
depicted in the drawings. Revise elevations to include these details and  
verify if the four seasons room would include these details.  
d) Submit product specification sheets for siding, roof, windows and doors.  
Verify the proposed porch will be wood.  
e) Question if the existing dormer is accurately depicted on the elevations.  
f) Suggest the Board request a site visit to better understand the scope of  
work.  
Attachments:  
D.  
362 Londonairy Circle  
Addition (Sunroom, 272sqft)  
Submitted by Zach Potts  
a) Staff notes the existing deck will be replaced with the proposed sunroom  
addition.  
b) The Architectural Design Standards state details in the wings should be  
the same or subordinate to those in the main body.  
c) The Architectural Design Standards state exposed foundations and tie  
courses shall be of a consistent material on all elevations. The  
Architectural Design Standards further state additions should be designed  
to be compatible with the main structure by incorporating materials and a  
foundation to match. The majority of the house has an exposed brick  
foundation. Since the addition is proposed to have a substantial amount of  
exposed foundation, suggest matching the exposed brick foundation rather  
than the concrete block.  
d) Suggest wrapped 6”x6” deck posts rather than the 4”x4” posts.  
Attachments:  
Other Business  
VII.  
A.  
1101 Barlow Road (Ellsworth Meadows Golf Course) [Informal Review]  
New Construction (Clubhouse)  
Submitted by David Urbansky  
a) Staff notes the proposal includes construction of a new clubhouse for the  
City owned and operated Ellsworth Meadows Golf Club  
b) Work would include removal of the existing pavilion on the northwest  
portion of the existing parking lot.  
c) The Architectural Design Standards state the following:  
-
-
The main body must be the largest visible mass  
Wings may not be larger or taller than the main body of the  
structure, but they may be the same height.  
-
The front face of the main body must sit forward at least 18” from the  
face of the wings.  
Staff notes the design conflicts with the above standards as the main body  
is the smaller mass and is set back from a large wing. Question if one  
simple mass design could be considered with a large cross gable entryway.  
d) The Architectural Design Standards state large expanses of blank wall are  
to be avoided. Fenestration placement should be at a maximum of  
approximately every 12 feet. Staff notes additional fenestration would be  
required, especially on the south elevation.  
e) Question if roof pitches could be consistent around all elevations.  
Attachments:  
Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting:  
October 25, 2023.  
B.  
Attachments:  
Staff Update  
VIII.  
IX.  
Adjournment  
*
*
*