and that she was now hearing about an emergency vet hospital, grooming facility, a private dog park, and
kennel. She stated that she submitted evidence to the Planning Commission about noise and when more than
one dog is introduced.
Ms. Samantha D'Eramo, 6917 St. Regis Blvd., stated that the previous business on Prospect St. was a boarding
facility and it was purchased with the intent to have the same type of facility.
Ms. Carol Laspina, 1621 Prospect St., argued that the previous business on Prospect St. was not a 10,000
square foot facility with multiple services. She also stated that she spoke with staff at MyEyeDr., who said there
was a distinct smell on the warmer days coming from the vet office next door.
Dr. Valerie Shaker, 1948 Christine Dr., spoke in opposition to the proposed ordinance, stating that the Vet
Center would not be able to expand with services beneficial to the community, such as an emergency center or
cat-only clinic.
Mr. Tim Laspina, 1621 Prospect St., stated that proposed use of the Prospect St. land does not meet the Land
Development Code standard, the permit was not approved and the site has not been remediated .
Ms. Tara Gallegos, 1481 Prospect Rd., spoke in support of the proposed ordinance because development should
not negatively impact residential neighborhoods, with increased traffic and no sidewalks.
Ms. Dottie Movshin, 1501 Prospect, spoke in support of the proposed ordinance, stating there are more
appropriate places for businesses.
Mr. Sutton provided a summary of why the proposed ordinance was introduced and noted there are no active
kennel applications.
Further Council discussion occurred regarding other areas of District 2, the effect that a 300 foot setback would
have on businesses, and balancing residents and businesses in the same space .
There being no further comments, Mayor Anzevino closed the public hearing on Ordinance No . 25-92 at 8:35
p.m.
A public hearing was held on Ordinance No. 25-92.
9.
Public Comments
Ms. Samanatha D'Eramo, 6917 St. Regis Blvd. asked about the difference between "voters" versus "electors" in
the proposed Charter amendments.
Mrs. Sarah Norman, 2212 Edgeview Dr., stated that the reason for the Planning Commission moratorium
legislation is to provide a pause in order to review the Land Development Code.
Mr. Ron Brubaker, 7593 Partridge Meadows Dr. East, stated that the Life Center Plus facility has gone into
receivership and suggested that the City take another look at it as a community recreation center .
Mr. Scott Lancaster, 6900 Hunting Hollow Lane West, commented that the City of Solon has a very nice
recreation center and it would be beneficial for Hudson to have one as well.
Ms. Carol Laspina, 1621 W. Prospect St., stated that she would also like to see a recreation center for the Life
Center Plus facility is in disrepair and it would be more valuable to start new on vacant land.
Mr. Rob Kagler, 65 Manor Dr., commented on the duties of the Environmental Awareness Committee being
included in the proposed Park and Natural Resource Board Charter amendment and asked the City not to
restrict free speech.