City of Hudson, Ohio

CD Meeting Agenda - Final

Architectural & Historic Board of Review

John Caputo, Chair

Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair

John Workley, Secretary

John Funyak

Françoise Massardier-Kenney

William Ray

Karl Wetzel

Nicholas Sugar, City Planner

Amanda Krickovich, Associate Planner

Wednesday, March 13, 2024

7:30 PM

Town Hall

27 East Main Street

Call To Order

Roll Call

II.

III.

Public Comment

Consent Applications

IV.

AHBR 24-156

Cutler Lane Entrance (Villas of Hudson)

Ground Signs for Residential Subdivision

Submitted by Derek Kuryla, KGK and Co.

a) Staff recommends approval as submitted.

Attachments:

Cutler Ln. AHBR Packet

Old Business

AHBR

50 Division Street (Historic District)

Alterations (Door)

23-1132

Submitted by James Field

a) Staff has prepared the attached report for consideration of the AHBR.

Attachments:

50 Division Street Staff Report 3.13.24 Meeting

50 Division St. AHBR Packet

50 Division ST. AHBR Packet 2.28.24 Meeting

50 Division St. AHBR Packet - 2.14.2024 Meeting

Legislative History

1/10/24

2/14/24

Architectural & Historic Board continued

of Review

Architectural & Historic Board continued

of Review

AHBR

7585 N. Vinemont Ct.

23-1109

Addition (Covered Deck, 288sqft)

Submitted by Kevin McCausland, McCausland Landscapes

a) This case was tabled at the February 28, 2024 AHBR meeting. The Board

requested the applicant explore a different privacy screen wall that would

be more compatible with an open-air concept in order to not be required to

incorporate a foundation to match the house. Additionally, the Board

requested the rake boards be more consistent on all elevations.

b) The applicant has revised the elevations to show a half privacy railing as

well as a more consistent rake board design.

Attachments:

7585 N. Vinemont Ct. AHBR Packet 3.13.24 Meeting

7585 N. Vinemont Ct. AHBR Packet

Legislative History

2/28/24 Architectural & Historic Board continued

of Review

New Business

VI.

AHBR 24-200

112 First Street (D.O Summers Cleaners)

Sign (Wall & Projecting)

Submitted by Mike Bizjak

a) Question if the signs would be illuminated. Staff notes internal

illumination is prohibited per the Land Development Code (zoning)

b) The Architectural Design Standards state “Storefronts with common

architectural elements should have signs that share continuity of design so

that the placement and design of individual signs contribute to the cohesive

appearance created by the common architectural elements. Elements of the

sign should create an overall cohesive design, reflect simplicity, avoid

visual clutter and ensure legibility.” Staff notes the proposed wall sign

would be affixed using an aluminum tubing structure, which is atypical of

the First and Main Development. Staff recommends the sign be pin

mounted to better complement surrounding signage.

c) The Architectural Design Standards state “signs should have a matte

finish, not have a glossy or reflective finish.” Verify signs would have a

matte finish.

Attachments:

D.O Summers AHBR Packet

AHBR

69 West Streetsboro Street (Citizens Bank)

23-1091

Signs (Building, Awning & Instructional)

Submitted by Iliana Kazandziev, Agile Signs

a) Staff notes Citizens Bank went to AHBR on August 9, 2023 and received an

exterior alteration approval. Additionally, the project wentto Planning

Commission on December 11, 2023 for Conditional Use approval.

b) The applicant is proposing two building signs awnings, lighting and

instructional signs.

c) The Land Development Code allows for two building signs when the

property has two frontages. The proposed building signs are in compliance

with the size requirements as per the LDC.

d) Staff notes existing goose neck lighting would be removed and replaced

with a different design and light bars would be installed at awnings. Staff

suggests removing the lightbars as it conflicts with the gooseneck lighting

design.

e) The Land Development Code states lettering on instructional signs can not

exceed two inches in height. Revise lettering height to comply with this

requirement.

f) Staff notes the applicant is proposing a Weathertyte awning fabric.

Provide a specification sheet to confirm material.

g) The Architectural Design Standards state signs shall have a matte finish.

Revise plans to depict a matte finish.

Attachments:

Citizens Bank AHBR Packet

AHBR 24-155

33 E. Main Street (Historic District)

Alterations

Submitted by Robyn Meeker

a) The applicant is proposing to alter all of the porch areas to include spindle

work at the porch rake board and skirting. The applicant has submitted

photos documenting this design was previously utilized.

b) The applicant is proposing to use cedar wood as the material and intends

to paint the wood colors that would currently match the existing.

c) Staff recommends approval as submitted.

Attachments:

33 E. Main St. AHBR Packet

AHBR 20-

875

36 S. Main Street (Yours Truly)

Alteration (Rooftop Screening)

Submitted by Andrew Shibley

a) Staff notes an extensive exterior alteration was approved by the AHBR on

10.14.2020.

b) The applicant has requested the AHBR to reconsider the condition of

approval that rooftop equipment shall be screened from the street. Staff

notes the Architectural Design Standards require all mechanical roof

equipment to be screened from public view.

c) The applicant has submitted photos indicating the roof equipment is visible

form the street; however, it appears a reduced screen could be utilized

based on the position of the building close to the street. Staff recommends

the applicant perform a sight line study from the sidewalk on the east side

of Darrow Road to determine adequate screening.

Attachments:

Previously Approved Plans

Yours Truly Hudson Photos for AHBR 3.13.24

AHBR 24-182

136 Franklin Street (Historic District)

Alteration (Porch Steps)

Submitted by Derek Mills

a) Staff notes the home was built in 2014. The Architectural Design

Standards state because the house is not greater than 50 years old, the

house would not be contributing to the Historic District and would be

reviewed according to the type standards rather than the Secretary of

Interior Standards.

b) The Architectural Design Standards state all steps in front of doors must

be the full width of the opening, regardless of whether all portions of the

opening are functioning doors. Confirm the width of the stairs would not

be changing.

c) The Architectural Design Standards state materials used on an open porch

or screen room need not be the same as other materials in the structure,

but should be related to materials used in the details of the structure.

Question the brick material and if it will be similar to the exposed

foundation and pillars.

Attachments:

136 Franklin Street AHBR Packet

AHBR -

23-521

290 N. Main (Historic District)

Alterations (Door & Window)

Submitted by Anthony Luketic

a) Staff notes this case went to the AHBR on June 14, 2023 for an addition.

The Board approved the proposed plans. The applicant is requesting

changes.

b) The applicant is proposing to change the west elevation window design to

a sliding glass door that will match the south elevation patio door design.

Additionally, the applicant is proposing a concrete stair walk out. The

applicant states railings are not being proposed.

c) The applicant is also proposing to change the door on the south elevation

to a different door design to match.

Attachments:

290 N. Main AHBR Packet

AHBR 24-186

2205 Victoria Parkway

Addition (Second Story, Porch & Garage)

Submitted by Christine Sampat

a) Staff notes this project went to the July 14, 2021 AHBR.

b) Staff notes this project will be reviewed by the AHBR due to the significant

changes and the conflict with the Architectural Design Standards.

c) When conducting a final inspection, staff noted the following changes:

- The first-floor windows on the west elevation were not installed. The

Architectural Design Standards state large expanses of blank wall are to

be avoided. Fenestration placement should be at a maximum of

approximately every 12 feet.

- Second floor windows omit grid pattern on the west elevation.

- Window size and grid pattern are different than what was approved on

the east elevation. The Architectural Design Standards state the building

shall have a typical window used for most window. Question if the

window changes comply with this requirement.

- Wide trim band not installed under the gable and the window size and

grid pattern and different on the front elevation.

- A different garage door design.

Attachments:

2205 Victoria Parkway AHBR Packet

AHBR 21-

310

38 Division Street (Historic District)

Addition (Breezeway & Kitchen)

Submitted by Jeffrey Goodman, Ultimate Home Remodeling

a) Staff notes this project went to AHBR on June 9, 2021. The Board

incorporated conditions into the approval regarding the lap siding to be

feathered in and to incorporate a dormer on the garage.

b) Staff notes this property is located in the Historic District and the

significant changes would require review by the AHBR.

c) When conducting a final inspection, staff noted the following changes:

- The garage roof dormer was not built.

- Incorporated trim, rather than feathering in the lap siding. The

Architectural Design Standards state wall materials should be blended

across the façade.

The breezeway is not inset. Staff notes an inset design was

incorporated to make the masses more distinguishable.

- Different entry door designs.

Attachments:

38 Division Street AHBR Packet

AHBR 24-199

134 Chadbourne Drive

Addition (First Floor Garage & Second Floor)

Submitted by Nate Bailey, Hara Architects

a) The Architectural Design Standards state replacement wall and roof

materials should be blended across a facade (rather than small patch

areas) to ensure compatibility with existing materials. Question how the

siding will be blended in on the right side elevation.

b) The Architectural Design Standards state details in the main body must be

consistently applied throughout all sides of the main body. Question if the

front elevation dormer window, the right side elevation window and the

rear elevation windows should incorporate shutters to match the house.

c) The Architectural Design Standards state roofs on projections should

match the roof material of the building, and to the extent possible, shall be

same kind of roof. Confirm existing roof material will match the proposed

roof material.

Attachments:

134 Chadbourne Dr. AHBR Packet

AHBR 24-203

43 Church Street (Historic District)

Addition (Entertaining Space)

Submitted by Nick Boka, Anthony Slabaugh Remodeling & Design

a) The proposal contains a rear and side addition to a historic building. To

assist with review of the application, the AHBR may wish to seek the

advice of the historic preservation consultant architect per LDC Section

1202.04(b)(3).

b) Staff notes the proposal would require the following variances through the

Board of Zoning Appeals.

- The Land Development Code requires a forty-foot rear yard setback

and the site plan depicts a nineteen foot setback.

- The Land Development Code requires accessory structures to be

located entirely behind the principal structure. Staff notes, with the

addition, the existing garage would be located partially within the side

yard.

c) Staff notes additional storm water measures are required to the total

impervious surface of the lot to exceed 40%. The applicant would

coordinate with the Engineering Department.

d) Staff notes the proposed addition would be made to a 2018 mudroom

addition.

e) Section III-2 of the Design Standards indicates the application shall be

reviewed per the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Historic

Rehabilitation and Preservation Brief #14 and #16. Two primary items

from the Standard for Rehabilitation are:

- New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall

not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new

work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with

the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the

historic integrity of the property and its environment.

New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be

undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential

form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be

unimpaired.

f) Staff notes the following preliminary review of the Preservation Brief’s

guidance on additions:

- Question the collective size of the additions compared to the main

historic mass.

The addition would generally utilize compatible materials; however,

recommend a wood door in lieu of the proposed fiberglass door on the

north elevation.

Question the transom windows on the east elevation and if they are

compatible with the existing building.

Staff notes the east elevation would give the appearance of the mud

room wrapping around the addition. Suggest a more defined break

between the two masses.

Question the rear folding door design and if the width should be

narrowed to be centered on the mass.

- Question how siding would be blended with the existing mud room.

Attachments:

43 Church Street AHBR Packet

AHBR 24-205

121 Elm Street (Historic District)

Addition (Kitchen and Primary Suite)

Submitted by Gordon Costlow

a) Proposal contains a large rear addition to the historic structure and

connecting the detached garage to the addition. To assist with review of

the application, the AHBR may wish to seek the advice of the historic

preservation consultant architect per LDC Section 1202.04(b)(3).

b) Detached buildings are required to have a minimum side yard setback of

four feet while attached buildings require an eight ft setback. The existing

garage is currently detached and subject to the four-foot setback; however,

is proposed to become attached. Staff will confirm if any variance would

be needed for such change in the structure.

c) Section III-2 of the Design Standards indicates the application shall be

reviewed per the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Historic

Rehabilitation and Preservation Brief #14 and #16. Two primary items

from the Standard for Rehabilitation are:

- New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall

not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new

work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with

the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the

historic integrity of the property and its environment.

- New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be

undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential

form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be

unimpaired.

d) The Standards for Rehabilitation encourage the new addition to be

subordinate to the historic building and not compete in size, scale or

design. Preliminary design review considerations include the ability to:

- Revise to have the additions inset from the historic masses and the ridge

heights lower than the existing roof forms. Of note would be at the right

elevation kitchen area and the second-floor addition.

- Revise the rear porch hip roof to a gable to be compatible with the rest of

the house

- Establish a compact footprint so the scale of the addition does not

impact the existing scale of the existing house.

Attachments:

121 Elm St. AHBR Packet

Other Business

VII.

Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting:

February 28, 2024.

AHBR

2-28-24

Attachments:

February 28, 2024 AHBR Minutes - Draft

Staff Update

VIII.

IX.

Adjournment