City of Hudson, Ohio  
CD Meeting Agenda - Final  
Architectural & Historic Board of Review  
John Caputo, Chair  
Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair  
John Workley, Secretary  
John Funyak  
Françoise Massardier-Kenney  
William Ray  
Karl Wetzel  
Nicholas Sugar, City Planner  
Amanda Krickovich, Associate Planner  
Wednesday, April 24, 2024  
7:30 PM  
Town Hall  
27 East Main Street  
Call to Order  
Roll Call  
II.  
Public Comment  
III.  
IV.  
Consent Applications  
15 High Street (Historic District)  
Alteration (Shingle Replacement)  
Submitted by Michael Moore, The Kozlowski Co.  
a) Staff recommends approval as submitted.  
Attachments:  
2361 Leeway Drive  
Accessory Structure (Pavilion)  
Submitted by Eric Kuczek  
a) Staff recommends approval as submitted.  
Attachments:  
7631 Bendleton Drive  
Alteration (Window Replacement)  
Submitted by Scott Doughman, Window Nation  
a) Staff recommends approval as submitted.  
Attachments:  
Old Business  
V.  
1727 Mayflower Lane  
Addition (Attached Garage)  
Submitted by Timothy Raggets  
a) Staff notes this case went to the April 10, 2024 AHBR meeting and was  
continued for the applicant to further study the design.  
b) The Architectural Design Standards state “New buildings and alterations  
shall respect the existing context and framework . The design of any  
building shall be judged in reference to its site and character of  
surroundings, not as an independent object.” “The City has a  
responsibility to maintain a high quality public realm and character.”  
Staff notes the applicant is proposing an approximate 16’ high bifold  
garage door design on the public face of the house. Staff notes the  
following:  
-
Question how the horizontal and vertical seams would appear when  
the garage is in a closed state. Submit a photo example of an existing  
bifold door, taken from a straight on perspective, to help the AHBR  
evaluate.  
-
Question the appearance of the garage door when in an opened state  
as the door opens outward. The submitted documentation suggests a  
resulting unproportional opening with a substantial projection that  
would mask the existing architecture.  
c) The Architectural Design Standards state “Attached garages shall not face  
the street except for new development with a front yard depth of 130 ft or  
more”. Based on such, staff notes a similar garage door design could be  
considered as a replacement; however, the proposed design adds additional  
prominence and visual impact than that of a typical garage door.  
Attachments:  
Legislative History  
2/28/24  
4/10/24  
Architectural & Historic Board continued  
of Review  
Architectural & Historic Board continued  
of Review  
172 Aurora Street (Historic District)  
Alteration, Addition & Accessory Structures  
Submitted by Eric Kuczek  
a) Staff notes this case went to the AHBR on April 10, 2024. The Board  
requested the assistance of the Consultant and also requested a site visit.  
b) The site visit was held on April 16, 2024. The report from the Consultant is  
attached for the Board to review.  
Attachments:  
New Business  
VI.  
30 Ravenna Street  
Sign (Wall & Ground Sign)  
Submitted by Mark Loboda  
a) The applicant is proposing to reface the existing wall sign and ground sign  
on the property.  
b) The Architectural Design Standards state the elements of the sign be  
consolidated into a minimum number of elements, whether words, symbols,  
or graphics. Staff recommends simplifying and reducing the text on the  
wall sign to better comply with this standard.  
c) The Architectural Design Standards state the lettering within a sign panel  
should not exceed approximately 70% of the height and length of the sign  
panel. Revise plans to show lettering dimensions on wall sign to verify  
compliance of this standard.  
d) The Architectural Design Standards state ground signs should be designed  
to relate to and share common design elements with the building and the  
sign(s) attached to the building. Question if the design of the ground sign  
meets this requirement.  
e) Verify the material used on the signs and how it will be applied to the  
existing panel.  
Attachments:  
89 E. Streetsboro Street (Historic District)  
Alteration (Window Replacement)  
Submitted by Chelsea Caspersen  
a) The applicant is replacing two windows. The existing windows are wood  
and the applicant is proposing to replace with the Pella Reserve  
Traditional windows without grids.  
b) The Secretary of Interior standards state deteriorated materials must be  
repaired rather than replaced. If repair is determined not feasible then a  
like material must be used. Submit documentation of deterioration.  
Attachments:  
2078 Ravenna Street  
Accessory Structure (Detached Garage)  
Submitted by Rebecca Pantuso, Pantuso Architects  
a) Staff notes this property went to the Board of Zoning & Building Appeals  
on October 19, 2023 and received approval for a structure size variance.  
b) The Architectural Design Standards state enclosed accessory buildings  
shall incorporate some elements similar to the main body, for example  
similar corner boards, window types, or materials. Question the design  
elements that match the existing house.  
c) The Architectural Design Standards state all facades (including the rear)  
over twelve (12) feet long shall have at least one window or door opening.  
Staff recommends fenestration on the first floor and a design element detail  
in the gable of the rear elevation.  
d) Question the application of the roof shingle design; however, staff notes it  
would be oriented to the interior of the property.  
Attachments:  
19 Warrensburg Circle  
Addition (Second story living space)  
Submitted by Nate Bailey, Hara Architects  
a) The applicant is proposing a second story addition of living space above  
the attached garage.  
b) The Architectural Design Standards states The city has a responsibility to  
maintain a high quality public realm and character. Staff notes the  
proposed dormer would be flush with the front face of the wall. Revise to  
step back, creating a separation of roof shingles between the dormer roof  
mass.  
c) The Architectural Design Standards state doors and windows on the public  
faces of a building should be arranged so that they are regulated by a  
system of (invisible) parallel and perpendicular lines. Question the window  
alignment in the dormer in comparison to the existing house.  
Attachments:  
166 Ravenna Street  
Accessory Structure (Detached Garage)  
Submitted by Temurjon Akhadov  
a) Staff notes this case went to the Board of Zoning and Building Appeals on  
April 18, 2024 and was granted a side yard setback variance.  
b) The Architectural Design Standards state details must be consistently  
applied throughout all sides of the structure. Revise elevations to depict  
consistent overhangs and eaves on all sides of the structure.  
c) The Architectural Design Standards state enclosed accessory buildings  
shall incorporate some elements similar to the main body, for example  
similar corner boards, window types, or materials. Staff notes the  
following:  
-Question if the siding reveal could match the existing house siding.  
-Question if the proposed windows could be a double hung design to  
match the existing.  
Attachments:  
Other Business  
VII.  
Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting: April  
10, 2024.  
Attachments:  
Staff Update  
VIII.  
IX.  
Adjournment  
*
*
*